• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

NSW AAGPS 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rob hart

Ted Thorn (20)
33-7 Scots two yellows to Scots in firsts
Scots 4ths best Oakhill 2nds 14-12
Scots 2nds down 19-14 v Oakhill 1sts
 

brumbiesrugby

Nev Cottrell (35)
Waves deep on attack. Last ditch Joeys D wide right bundles the Waverley winger into touch and the referee calls time. Outstanding game by both sides. Joeys 49 Waverley 47. 1 missed goal kick in it.
 

Jim Belshaw

Bob Loudon (25)
I will cross post this on the CAS forum.

Tough day in many ways for TAS against Cranbrook. I arrived late and missed the early matches so started with 16Av16A. Cranbrook won something like 60-0. They were bigger, faster and more skilled, although TAS maintained the intensity of its tackling for much of the game. Listening to some of the junior boys coming up to watch the 16As I had the feeling, I may be incorrect, that there were high scores in some of the earlier games. Don't know however.

The match between TAs 2nds and Cranbrook thirds was good evenly matched football. Cranbrook scored very early, 7-0. It then took TAS 15 minutes to score and convert. HT score 7-7. Cranbrook scored early in the second half but then TAS started to run away with the game. Final score TAS 28 - Cranbrook 14. The last time I played on the Horden Oval for TAS seconds, this time against Crabrook seconds, we won too!

My heart sank as the Cranbrook Firsts ran onto the field. I had a lot about the team on the forums. They are big and also very fast. Cranbrook scored and converted at the third minute. Twenty five minutes later, the score was 33-0. Cranbrook were winning TAS line-outs, won several scrums against the feed and were pinching TAS ball in the rucks. TAS then steadied and were attacking at half time. HT score 33-0. Cranbrook scored soon after the break and then twice more, but it was a little more even. Final score 52-0.

Two things stopped the game being a total rout. The first was the number of penalties Cranbrook attracted. This was a feature of all three matches i saw, but especially the Firsts. I could wish that TAS did more goal kicking rather than relying on pick and drive. The second was the TAS tackling. With big fast backs playing against smaller boys, you often only have one chance to stop the movement. TAS tackled its heart out, time and again stopping movements, sometimes just before the line. The second half score of Cranbrook 19-TAS 0 would have been a cricket score without that.

The lessons? Chatting around the ground, Cranbrook feels that they can win the CAS. I think that's right so long as they can get the penalty count down. For TAS's part, it's a young team, all the top TAS teams seem young, reduced by injury. on the long bus trip home tonight the boys will be a bit sore and sorry. I don't think that they should be depressed. There are things that need to be fixed, but for the firsts in particular who maintained their intensity in the face of what may be CAS's first grade team, that spirit gives them, I think, a solid base for coming games.
 

brumbiesrugby

Nev Cottrell (35)
I will cross post this on the CAS forum.

Tough day in many ways for TAS against Cranbrook. I arrived late and missed the early matches so started with 16Av16A. Cranbrook won something like 60-0. They were bigger, faster and more skilled, although TAS maintained the intensity of its tackling for much of the game. Listening to some of the junior boys coming up to watch the 16As I had the feeling, I may be incorrect, that there were high scores in some of the earlier games. Don't know however.

The match between TAs 2nds and Cranbrook thirds was good evenly matched football. Cranbrook scored very early, 7-0. It then took TAS 15 minutes to score and convert. HT score 7-7. Cranbrook scored early in the second half but then TAS started to run away with the game. Final score TAS 28 - Cranbrook 14. The last time I played on the Horden Oval for TAS seconds, this time against Crabrook seconds, we won too!

My heart sank as the Cranbrook Firsts ran onto the field. I had a lot about the team on the forums. They are big and also very fast. Cranbrook scored and converted at the third minute. Twenty five minutes later, the score was 33-0. Cranbrook were winning TAS line-outs, won several scrums against the feed and were pinching TAS ball in the rucks. TAS then steadied and were attacking at half time. HT score 33-0. Cranbrook scored soon after the break and then twice more, but it was a little more even. Final score 52-0.

Two things stopped the game being a total rout. The first was the number of penalties Cranbrook attracted. This was a feature of all three matches i saw, but especially the Firsts. I could wish that TAS did more goal kicking rather than relying on pick and drive. The second was the TAS tackling. With big fast backs playing against smaller boys, you often only have one chance to stop the movement. TAS tackled its heart out, time and again stopping movements, sometimes just before the line. The second half score of Cranbrook 19-TAS 0 would have been a cricket score without that.

The lessons? Chatting around the ground, Cranbrook feels that they can win the CAS. I think that's right so long as they can get the penalty count down. For TAS's part, it's a young team, all the top TAS teams seem young, reduced by injury. on the long bus trip home tonight the boys will be a bit sore and sorry. I don't think that they should be depressed. There are things that need to be fixed, but for the firsts in particular who maintained their intensity in the face of what may be CAS's first grade team, that spirit gives them, I think, a solid base for coming games.
. Should be a cracking game between Waverley and Cranbrook then.
 

axel

Bill Watson (15)
7 tries to 5 doesn't sound as bad for Shore, although there're obviously still some defensive issues for Shore that will be exposed by Scots etc. if they don't tighten them up.
To be fair, Knox had replaced 60% of their team when Shore scored their last 2 tries, the last one off the biggest knock on, that somehow the ref missed. Imho 7 tries to 3 was probably a fairer indication of the the game. Kudos to the Shore 2nds who are a very gutsy team and deservedly won 14-6
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
Scores from Stanmore

1sts New v Augs 43-0 to Newington, some scintillating backline play

2nds New v Augs 50-17

3rds New v Pius (1sts) 12-50

4ths New v Pius (2nds) 14-14

5ths New v Pius (3rds) 42-14

16A New v Augs 7-0 and extremely hard fought game with the winning try coming in the last minute after Newington had withstood 15 minutes of goal line attack by Augs

15A New v Augs 45-7

15B New v Pius (A) 7-22

15C New v Augs 25-25

13A New v Augs 54-7

13E New v Pius (C) 25-10
 

Quick Hands

David Wilson (68)
7 tries to 5 doesn't sound as bad for Shore, although there're obviously still some defensive issues for Shore that will be exposed by Scots etc. if they don't tighten them up.

How do you score 7 tries and get to 50?

7 x 7 = 49 (or it did when I went to school) :)

Penalty goals/Field goals?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top