Yeah Toulon aren't successful at all.. and if you actually listened to Giteau he was going overseas before 2011 Tests
But he didn't go overseas because he was dropped was always planning to after the RWC
Fine, but he was dropped, so the value in his staying wouldn't be much to us.
I would have thought restraint of trade could possibly cover itOn what basis do you think it could be challenged in court?
You are rewriting history.There would have been enormous value in Giteau staying, Robbie Deans was just too stubborn to admit it.
I would have thought restraint of trade could possibly cover it
Absolutely the right move, we can't compete with France and Japan money otherwise. Even more impressive is they're allowing club players to do it also which is great for those fringe wallaby level players.
It's a big turn around from having 'no appetite' for sabbaticals only a few months ago though.
I think this and the NRC are some great moves made this year, really shaking things up. They won't have immediate impact to the national team but there is potential for the future.
You are rewriting history.
Giteau went to France on a shitload of money.
No one suggested he was worth that to the ARU,and should be retained at the time.
The wage on offer from France was irrelevant, I'm talking about his experience and maturity and that he was still of enormous value to Australian Rugby when he left Australia.
You are still rewriting history.The wage on offer from France was irrelevant, I'm talking about his experience and maturity and that he was still of enormous value to Australian Rugby when he left Australia.
The ARU were right not to offer him a another contract since Robbie had gone off him and he wasn't going to be selected, but that doesn't mean he wasn't worthy of been offered another contract.
The wage on offer from France was irrelevant, I'm talking about his experience and maturity and that he was still of enormous value to Australian Rugby when he left Australia.
The ARU were right not to offer him a another contract since Robbie had gone off him and he wasn't going to be selected, but that doesn't mean he wasn't worthy of been offered another contract.
You are still rewriting history.
Giteau was still well entrenched with the Wallaby squad,when he chased the money in France.So money is totally relevant,as that was his driver in making the move.Not discontent with his status with the Wallabies.
To save you looking it up he signed in February, before a very disappointing Brumbies season,and after he had been on the preceding Spring tour.
He started in the Test against Samoa in July.
Let's remember he was 28 when he left.
You can't blame Robbie for everything.
You are rewriting history.
Giteau went to France on a shitload of money.
No one suggested he was worth that to the ARU,and should be retained at the time.