I was reluctant to post on this thread; for the very title of it discouraged anything but censure.
Folks - we are getting too carried away with facts. Facts are inconvenient. What I like is the vibe; the vibe of this Wallabies team based on the extended experience of watching one 3N game. I love the vibe,
Under Knuckles Connolly the Wallabies would have been less likely to play as the Wallabies did tonight, as fly to the moon - and without a rocket. And the same goes for the Great Pontificator, Eddie Jones.
Those two other blokes would have us playing as other teams do: trying to compete with them as to the Golden Rule of how those others play.
What Deans is doing, and I give him credit without getting on the 2008 model bandwagon yet, is that he is looking for a point of difference that the Wallabies may have.
Shaking the tea leaves, throwing the dice, spinning the wheel, spraying the wall of the urinal in patterns, you can see that the Wallabies do have a point of difference. It is the Genia/Cooper nexus, and if others are involved in play excluding Genia or Cooper, then they play as if they were: having a go; against all odds, having a go.
Does it work all the time? Hell no. Will it work more often later? Hell yes. Will opponents be shit scared even if the Wallabies are just scratching their bums? Hell, yes.
Such freedom, such danger for the other team, though only relevant if the piggies can create the quality of pill to make it work, is Deans' legacy to Oz rugby.
Whatever the outcome of Deans' tenure, let's not let that slip between the cracks. We should play the Aussie way and let other teams combat our natural point of difference.
.