Ok, now I am more confused. I thought several articles had definitely stated Beale's phone had been forensically examined. I thought several articles had said Pulver was looking for the second phone (Patston's presumably). I guess these articles must have unreliable.
The wording in most articles has used MMS, Text and Whatsapp interchangeably.
Whenever getting into detail on Beale's 'forensics' though, I have only ever read about his Whatsapp account and his phone bill.
I've not read anything about searching the hard disk on his actual phone. Does anyone have it? If not, it seems we are relying on a web whatsapp record and a single MMS record on the 9th.
I thought the tribunal had cleared Beale of sending the second image.
From the Australian today:
But because the tribunal was not able to establish that Beale was responsible for this image, it stopped short of following what is understood to have been the Australian Rugby Union’s advice to it that it tear up his contract. Beale indeed claimed to have been “vindicated” that the evidence presented to the tribunal did not establish that he had been the author of this second image.
From what Smith says, its accepted that he sent the second image, just not that he was the author of it.
If it was so easy to crop the identity of the writer off the second image before it was sent why wasn't the tribunal aware of this and wouldn't they have questioned Beale on this and been less definitive in their statement.
I must be reading between the wrong lines.
Good question for the Tribunal that. I don't think any of the tribunal members were telecommunications experts. The only "forensic expert" I've heard about at the tribunal was supplied by Beale's management.
Even from 40,000 feet Peter Fitzsimmons spotted this in the Fitz files on the weekend.