O'Driscoll fumes at officials' decision
Ireland captain Brian O'Driscoll hit out at referee Jonathan Kaplan after the official failed to refer Wales' controversial try to a video replay.
Mike Phillips scored from an illegal quick line out as the hosts ran out 19-13 winners in Cardiff but O’Driscoll believes Kaplan should have used technology to check the call.
"That is what TMOs are for and I am pretty sure you can go to them, even from that far out. We try to play by the rules of the game,” said the 32-year-old.
"These games are won and lost on little moments and that was a huge moment. What's the point of having a TMO if you can't check that?
"When I went over to him he was pushing everyone away and I told him I was captain and he said that was fine but he wanted to talk to his touch judge.
"So I stood there and before anything else could be said he awarded the try.
"It was clearly an illegitimate try and we feel hard done by.”
The centre scored a record-equaling 24th Six Nations try but it proved scant consolation as Ireland slumped to their second defeat of the Championship.
"I couldn't care for that at the moment. It's deflating when you lose anyway - but to lose in a contentious manner makes it worse.
“I tried to relate that to Jonathan Kaplan and the touch judge and they were having none of it and it's really frustrating for such an incident to have a huge bearing on the game.”
Well, as much as I sympathise with BO'D on this, he is wrong. As far as I know, the TMO cannot be called to adjudicate on what happened at a lineout prior - only the grounding , act of scoring. That does not mitigate the ineptitude of Kaplan and his Arsistant Ref who have royally fucked up on this one.
Well, as much as I sympathise with BO'D on this, he is wrong. As far as I know, the TMO cannot be called to adjudicate on what happened at a lineout prior - only the grounding , act of scoring. That does not mitigate the ineptitude of Kaplan and his Arsistant Ref who have royally fucked up on this one.
Dodgy Try No Comfort To Hurricanes
They will have done nothing to change the Hurricanes' heartbreak after a 26-all draw, but arguments over two controversial Crusaders tries continued well after fulltime at Westpac Stadium last night.
The furore surrounded tries to Crusaders wing Zac Guildford and the last-gasp effort of hooker Tii Paulo.
It was halfback Andy Ellis' quick throw-in that led to Guildford's first- half try that will be discussed most.
Hurricanes coach Colin Cooper said after the match: "I don't think you can allow the opposition to touch the ball and have a quick throw-in, and probably the last try was pretty questionable too. I need to have a look at the evidence, but I think the ball touched our reserves, then Conrad Smith. Clearly you can't have a quick lineout from that, that's the law."
Cooper appears to be technically correct, though the blame for the error should lie not with South African referee Jonathan Kaplan, but with touch judge Garratt Williamson.
The devil appears to be in the definition. If it was deemed to be a quick lineout then it needed to be taken from the spot where the ball went out. If it was a quick throw it could not be touched by an opposition player.
Kaplan believed a quick lineout was legal as the ball had not been touched by a Crusaders' player and he had trusted his touch judge it was taken in the right place.
In the second instance he had seen Paulo clearly ground the ball and had asked TMO Glenn Newman if there was any reason not to award the try. "If I didn't have a TMO I would have given the try straight away."
anybody else think he resembles goebbels in inglourious basterds?