Yep, are you aware of how a business works?
If we're discussing JON second stint, coming into an organisation that is running out of money, lost a ton a market share and fast approaching bankruptcy are you suggesting that not making cuts but instead spending money the ident have to maybe win test matches would have seen the organisation thrive?
They minimized the hurt, from the lions tour we will have the abilit to expand and think about the future.
Can you read a balance sheet?
After the losses for ARC had been accounted for, the ARU was worth 25% more in 2007 than it is today!
You are not listening re the revenue, Before JON,in 2007 we had the same revenue as the Kiwi's.4 years of JON and they have increased their revenue and ours has reduced by $10M.
Please explain how this is a good result!
Name one other business where revenues are decreasing and it is considered a good thing.
Tell me how reducing shareholders funds is a good thing.
Yep we will earn some coin next year when the lions visit, but this is not JON's doing,they are scheduled to come every 12 years.
It's actually a negative, that despite being at the helm for 12 odd years, the business is still reliant upon once off events (RWC, Lions) to keep the joint afloat until the next one.
Had he hung around until after the Lions, he would have trumpeted the profit for the year,the increase in shareholders funds everyone would hailed him a hero, just as they did the first time around.
Only problem is he lumps his replacement with a business model that he has never been able to get to work despite 2 go's and 12 years.
Hopefully his replacement can build a sustainable business model that works year in year out.