dbla
Have to agree with everything you said.
Size by itself doesn't matter it's not the size of the ticker either. It's aggression, mongrel, playing in a team way, fitness of body and brain, rugby smarts and add about 10 more things in there.
And that's only the forwards; no use talking about the backs or about this guy should have been picked instead of another guy. You may have got one tougher, smarter dog but he wouldn't have made a difference against the wolf pack.
Yep, we have dogs in our pack, big dogs; but they have wolves. Until we get wolves at these U20 matches, and for the the Wallabies for that matter, we will be lamenting being out-muscled, out rugby-smarted and out team-played as it has been year after year after year.
This was a decent Oz U/20 team and better than I thought. In a parallel universe have these same players born in New Zealand with their superior junior coaching, better pathways and having the manic desire to be the greatest rugby player they can be etc etc. Then bring them back through the black hole to Argentina in this universe, give them a gold jersey and let them play against the blacks again and you would see a much closer contest.
It sounds over the top but having lived in NZ for 8 years, about the ages from 13 to 21 I know this country doesn't have quality of people across the board, nor the quality of systems, to produce the players that NZ produces at this age, unless by exception.
My experience was a long time ago but I doubt that anything has changed.
Please don't post that we beat this team and that team so it wasn't a bad effort. I know that and that our lads did their best.
Unfortunately, that's the point.