He's right. One-out pick and drives are useful for
As a basic "plan" for moving the ball downfield they are fucking useless, yet it is one of only two plays that we have left (the other being pass the ball to the 10 and see what happens). You often read about "wearing the defence down" but it has long stopped working, at least against SA/NZ. It's absolutely do drama for the AB and SA inside defenders to shut down our pick an drive, they don't even look remotely stretched doing it.
- making small adjustments to field position for the purposes of launching a specific attack or kick; and
- having a crack at the line when you are inside their 10.
Even though we are creatively bankrupt, we do have elite footballers playing and they are capable of impressive feats when they have the ball and some space.
As others have stated the pick-and-drive has its place in the game, what infuriates me as a supporter is when an Australian team gets within 5 metres of the opposition tryline through some wonderful expansive play and then goes all conservative and try to pick and drive over the line, with very limited success. Sure, if they need to re-align have one or two quick pick and drives and then send it wide as the defence closes in on the ruck. Rugby 101 is to attack the space FFS.
Is it possible to be a dumb human but a smart rugby player? Cooper, maybe?
I think the kind of smarts Hux is talking about might be about general intelligence. Larkham was the smartest guy in the team and Greegs was no slouch in the brain department either. No wonder they outsmarted the likes of Carlos.
Is it possible to be a dumb human but a smart rugby player? ...
Yes - take Warnie as a cricketing example.
Yes - take Warnie as a cricketing example.
When link first started at the Reds he really took the time to know Cooper ( this was around the time of Hynsies bucks party debacle) . I remember one of the things he did say was how astute Cooper was at Rugby tactics.
Maybe so but lets say there are 20minutes remaining in a match, we need a converted try to win. Larkham notices our line-out is dominating, so he cooly kicks to the corner. Cooper however thinks we need a try i better pull out a miracle and win the game with a cheeky flick-pass, or i'll try side step the whole team. Then when it doesnt come off he will say "Im an attacking player and i cant play any other way, at least i had a go etc. etc."
I dont think we can compare the rugby smarts of Larkham to Cooper. Cooper may be aware of "rugby tactics" but Larkham actually displayed good (self-less) decision making on the field, Cooper struggles to do this. I think Coopers sublime skills often get misunderstood as "rugby smarts".
His fend on Lachie Munro was a beautiful thing.The try against the Blues last year where he stepped the winger and a few others and put Taps in was pure razzle dazzle but would not have meant anything if the guys around him weren't prepared to go with him.
He didn't do this last year (as far as i can remember) and in the 5 games for the Reds he played this year. That's more of a 2009 observation when he overplayed his hand too much. The other point is it really depends on the team around them and the pattern they are playing too. The try against the Blues last year where he stepped the winger and a few others and put Taps in was pure razzle dazzle but would not have meant anything if the guys around him weren't prepared to go with him.