This is surreal, no. 10 for the wobbs in one of biggest series ever to outcast in less than a week. Something very very wrong here, how did the ARU just sit back and let this happen?
THERE will be no James O'Connor on the team sheet when the Wallabies side to face the All Blacks on August 17 is read out.
Here's the latest. O'Connor failed to appear at the Wallabies team meeting in Sydney at 10am last Sunday morning, unsurprising considering he was heading into a Kings Cross club at 5.30am.
Kurtley Beale shared the clubbing but made the meeting.
It is staggering that O'Connor could have such a selfish view of the world. The coach who backed him for 40 Tests gave his thanks to the players for all they put in against the British and Irish Lions.
It essentially became the farewell speech as coach for Robbie Deans.
I'm not defending JOC (James O'Connor) here because it appears every other Wallaby made the meeting but 10am on the next day after the series is fucking harsh. I doubt any Lions players got up before 12pm or even went to bed.
Well, the Lions won the series...
it just emphasises the self centredness of the bloke. the team rules don't apply to me
edit: not to mention the utter disregard for Robbie deans who stuck by JOC (James O'Connor) and continued to play him at 10, although he really had no other choice in the end
Maybe no one else will share a room with JOC (James O'Connor)? Or maybe he demands his own room? haha! I joke of course but there is a little part of me that wonders.
I had occasion to chat with his parents a few years ago; they are lovely people but one comment struck me as odd at the time. While I always thought he was rushed into top level rugby at the time, they also had the feeling that four years at test level would see him out.This whole situation is really very sad. He actually can be a reasonable young bloke, quite polite, friendly and can hold a decent conversation unlike a lot of other players.
The massive ego and complete sense of entitlement is the problem. Also sad to say a reflection of his upbringing.
I'm aware his father would consistently text messages to senior people at the Rebels complaining that they were ruining James career by not playing him at 10.
I'm afraid I don't see his attitude changing because he just doesn't see it and none of his support network does either.
The words used were"we would be surprised if he was still at test level in 4 years".What do you mean by 'see him out'?
Four years of test rugby and he'll be done? Or that it would take four years at test level to see him realise his potential?