Ulrich
Nev Cottrell (35)
Alright.Yes. and since then Mogg has been on a downward projection. No way he would be in the mix now.
Then you may be better off with your current crop under a different coach than Jake.
Alright.Yes. and since then Mogg has been on a downward projection. No way he would be in the mix now.
You talk as if Cheika invented running rugby. It's basically the same way the Reds succeeded.
Unfortunately you cannot place less emphasis on the set piece at test level and be successful.
Disappointing that to some (not all) Qld and ACT supporters this comes down to a state issue onse again. It's all the Tahs fault, sack all the Tahs etc etc.
Before the usual Tahs bias statements are made, let me say, I supported Link's appointment, I wanted him to stay for the WC, and I would have made Horwill captain (as I said on another thread). However the facts are:
1. Link lost the respect of the player, he said so himself. That's untenable, he did the right thing to resign. If a CEO doesn't have the respect (not popularity, respect) of his staff, the business simply won't work.
2. Link appointed Hooper captain, he made Beale 10 for the first two Bled tests, he elected not to choose players going overseas, thus eliminating his previous captain, he chose not to select Horwill, he employed Patston. Not suggesting any of these were right or wrong decisions, but in the real world, you make your decisions, you wear the consequences
3. Yes, Hooper's support of Beale was clumsy, but I have yet to hear him (or anyone else for that matter) condone what Beale did. Likewise I haven't at any point heard Hooper not express support for Link. He expressed his support before this test, and again after it.
4. Apart from on here, I have haven't heard anyone suggest the loss of support for Link among the team was a Waratah instigated thing.
5. As to the press, each side was leaking selected information to their pet journos. That's how it works in any controversial situation, unfortunately.
6. Finally, as to Beale getting off lightly, until we have heard the outcome of his case, any comment here is mere guesswork.
Unfortunately this is what journalists do. There is not much consideration for ethics. In my experience lawyers are the same.This is the lowest I've ever seen Australian Rugby.
I'm probably never going to read an Australian newspaper reporting about rugby ever again. The way some of the journalists hung McKenzie out to dry was just horrendous.
Absolutely horrendous.
Really apart from a head coach the whole management structure of the Wallabies team must be looked at.
The whole ARU needs a good cleanout from the Chairman down with some professional people appointed to a Rugby Commission. The provincial crap has dragged us down to the point that the professional game is killing the game as a whole.
But have to start somewhere so start with the Wallabies as the dream of a Rugby Commission is I think a dream that is unlikely to ever be realised.
So in that regard the new head coach will have identify some key areas that need to be addressed and act quickly on filling support roles with that issues in mind.
For me the key areas are fitness, forward set pieces (which while much improved from the shit under Deans still need significant work) and the biggest area for me, kicking from hand. Lets get the basics right and the rest will flow.
Oh and institute a strict no dickheads policy. Zero tolerence. Get it players, don't like it or don't think you can actually be a professional, then go now you will be granted a release from any contract with no prejudice.
Bollocks.
None of the decisions about who played 10, choice of captain, business manager etc were decisions that should lead to his resignation - the decisions were his right as coach.
His departure was all to do with the aftermath of a puerile attempt at humour by a serial offender who by his own admission does dumb stuff without thinking.
And supporting your mate in the media without acknowledging the inappropriateness of his actions until you are forced to do so by your employers PR consultants is akin to condoning his actions. It has nothing to do with state bias but the fucktards who acted this way happened to be waratahs. If they were queenslanders I would have exactly the same opinion of them.
Hooper needs to read this
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...bealedi-patston-incident-20141016-116z0c.html
and realise how bloody inappropriate his comments were for a team captain, and either lift his game or fuck off from the captaincy.
We were already in front when he kicked the penalty - it just took the lead from 3pts to 6pts. With 7 pts for a converted try it still left us in the danger range. And the rest as they say is history.
Do people think Link would have survived if his win rate was 75% (including, say 2 wins against SA and 3 against NZ)?
Why does it matter now?
Of course he would.Do people think Link would have survived if his win rate was 75% (including, say 2 wins against SA and 3 against NZ)?
Hate to rain on your parade, but didn't he move OS?The only two "reliable" in game kickers for the Wallabies are To'omua and Cooper. I wish Jayden Hayward would hurry up and be eligible for Australia.
You talk as if Cheika invented running rugby. It's basically the same way the Reds succeeded.
Unfortunately you cannot place less emphasis on the set piece at test level and be successful.
my only objection to Mallett is that, as a pom, he wouldn't be able to motivate the Wallabies for the pool game against England in RWC 2015.