Mystery to me what they see in HaskellEngland retain the 23 that got up over Samoa:
England squad to face Australia:
Forwards: Dave Attwood, Kieran Brookes, Dylan Hartley, James Haskell, George Kruis, Courtney Lawes, Joe Marler, Ben Morgan, Matt Mullan, Chris Robshaw (c), Rob Webber, David Wilson, Tom Wood
Backs: Brad Barritt, Mike Brown, Owen Farrell, George Ford, Jonny May, Billy Twelvetrees, Anthony Watson, Richard Wigglesworth, Marland Yarde, Ben Youngs
http://www.planetrugby.com/story/0,25883,16024_9579407,00.html
As always with Dwyer, it's worth paying attention to the content of his arguments.
Older posters may remember this, but when he was advocating Beale at 13, it was part of a wider system of advocating an elusive, playmaking 13 and a crash-ball 12, which he described as reversing the traditional center roles. At the time, this was ridiculed because it was the opposite of what was then in vogue, but soon many international teams were playing precisely that style. Strangely, it never caught on in Australia. Instead we moved towards the New Zealand second-five configuration and have pretty much stayed there since.
Internet posters come and go, but Dwyer (heart attacks notwithstanding) is still here, and is still making well-considered statements about how the game can be played. If his ideas are different to ours, then perhaps that's an opportunity for us to learn something.
For the avoidance of doubt, I'm not advocating putting Beale at 13. I'm discussing Dwyer's former advocacy of it. Like KOB says, Dwyer's current thinking is to put him on the wing, and that's an argument I agree with.
That's a fair point: numbers on backs mean relatively little in Australian rugby currently, perhaps less so than any other national team. It's about channels now with players running in several of them. I guess what Dwyer means with Kuridrani is that he wants the sledgehammer running more at the defensive 10-12 channel, and the rapier running more in the wider channels. That's probably more papaltable to fans than actually putting a 12 on Kuridrani's back. It also implies the second playmaker playing somewhere other than in the centers.
I agree. The 13 needs to be a good ball player. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) isn't.
If world cup winning coaches always agreed with people on the Internet, there'd be no need for them.
Bob coached a great World Cup victory in 1991. That doesn't make every idea he suggest pure genius.
I don't even know where to begin.I really would like to see:
9: Genia
10: Tamoua (play flat and hard at the line)
11: Speight
12: Beale (crash ball 10 means beale would have a bit more time / space)
13: Falou (try something new with TK out injured)
14: ACC
15: Quade (second playmaker option at 15 like SA. Links well with Genia down the blind side)
Would be an exciting team to watch!
I don't even know where to begin.