Re the appointment of headmasters, I am guessing that the process differs between schools . so not sure whether in the case of a Waverley it is something that the school council decides or whether the Edmund Rice mob has a big input or a right of veto?
I gather Waverley pays an annual fee to Edmund Rice, so it strikes me as a sort of franchise . so I am guessing Edmund Rice must have some level of input
whether the new deputy is in the running, is also a question . I would presume that any righted minded ambitious deputy would be keen for the big job
so will be interested to see who gets the gig
I must say, I think being a headmaster in this day and age would be a tough gig . this generation of kids . or more importantly the parents .. would be enough to drive any sane individual to frustration
for what it's worth I think the new Waverley head should have a NUMBER 1 KPI of improving HSC results .. as I rightly or wrongly continue to believe that across the board results could be lifted . I certainly have had conversations with old boys who are of that view that the school's number 1 priority should be to help boys do their academic best
.. by way of example . the kid that could get an ATAR of 85, needs to have systems (and an environment) ion place to ensure he does in fact get an 85, and doesn't end up drifting .. getting a 75 or 80 ATAR
and similarly the kid who has potential to get 99, doesn't drift to an 89
however beyond that NUMBER 1 objective, that maintaining the school's great traditions . such as rugby ..would be another key KPI
p#ss off AFL . leave that to the Mexicans . stick to the traditional sports . yes if you have 350 kids in a year like Knox, and you have their budget . then you can offer everything .
so anyway hoping for a new Waverley head that is god fearing, not afraid to kick some butt, get some improved HSC results, prevent the poaching of gifted students (academic and sporting) and maintain the strong rugby tradition . amongst others
and all on a shoe string budget
not asking much