At the risk of running the ire of others I offer the following for debate.
A lot of things make up the competition that is the wonder of CAS Rugby.
And all of it, is well intentioned and of good heart.
I am sure if we had the ability to discuss with the headmasters of all the CAS schools, their objectives of linking education, spiritual well being and sporting capability, to turn out individuals (students), who make our society a better place would all be remarkably similar.
Rugby/sporting scholarships aside, the CAS Rugby Premiership (Plume Shield) is a numbers game.
The school with the biggest catchment and the most numbers of students per year, should in theory have the best chance of winning the Plume Shield.
So numbers tell you that Trinity and Alloys will struggle, Cranbrook will be middling and Knox and Barker will excel. These later schools are just bigger, not better, and hence have the sheer numbers to put a marginally better quality 1st XV on the field week in week out.
I leave Waverly College out as in their catchment, in my opinion, they compete only with Scots as a destination for a private school education so they have the opportunity of getting a better quality athlete by default and hence play above the ability, their enrollment numbers reflect. (I am happy to be shot down on this statement with some hard facts. I hold the Waverly program in high regard so I am just identifying a fact)
If these above mentioned factors are a given, then we are left with 2 genuine things the school can do to affect the teams they put on the field week in week out.
The first is the quality and availability of facilities to ensure the training and coaching regime, have the facilities to ply their trade to the students. In the case of all CAS schools this is pretty much even and level.
The second is to improve the quality of coaching across all grades (not just the 1sts) and have a sporting program that encourages participation (numbers) and sponsors excellence, ie getting students to aspire to and reach their capability ( 1st XV and A's).
Now this coaching costs money.
The rich schools can afford the likes of a Matt Williams et al to improve their sporting curriculum's which encourage participation and rewards excellence. None of these behavioral patterns should be criticized if it is applied across all years. (year 7 through to year 12)
What is worth criticizing or at the least having a healthy debate, is if kids get parachuted into the 1st XV or the 16A's in the last couple of years of school, (ie scholarships) with the intent of winning trophies or premierships, to make the perception of the entire school more important, than the individuals it is charged with turning out.
Part of the cultural strength of the CAS schools and GPS schools for that matter , is the pride respect and most importantly aspirational goals, the students have ( and all parents hope for) to make the 1st XV, 1st VIII or 1st XI.
The movement of players in a singular year group (age) within a school between the A's or the E's in every sport, provides that competitive spirit and aspiration, along with the dealing with disappointments, that stays with the kids for a lifetime. Its one of the benefits that private school education provides, that puts them in such good stead when they hit the real world and school is no longer provides a environment that protects them.
As parents and the people that influence how our schools educate our children, we need to take care that our aspiration for excellence in our schools and in this case excellence and results in the CAS 1st XV competition, does not get ahead of the real reason the kids are at these 6 CAS schools in the first place.
It will be a very sad day when premierships are bought by parachuting in through scholarships, 2 or 3 quality players in the firsts to get a desired result. The school maybe able to boast results, but what of the 2 or 3 kids who were displaced. How do they deal with this instant disappointment and how do parents who want the best for their children feel when a interloper, free of charge, displaces their son in a team that they have spent 5 years aspiring to play for.
Not only because because the new student may have displaced a kid who has spent 5 years at that school aspiring to wear the Red Jersey (Barker) or the Double Vee (Waverly), when he gets to year 12, but also for the all parents at the school whose excess fees subsidies that particular child's participation in the top team at their school.
Is it desirable to put in doubt the aspirations of year 8 and year 9 students to play in the 1sts??
If this aspiration was not true, then why do all CAS and GPS schools have such a strong Old Boy following. We all do it because playing for the 1st XV is important and we all value our school years irrespective of which school we attended.
I suppose the end point in this blog is for all parents who care for their kids education and their spiritual well being, should consider the long term cultural and individual personality impacts that scholarships have on all kids at the school.
Sponsoring sporting excellence through quality facilities and good coaching is a fabulous and very worthwhile objective that all schools aspire to, for all their students.
I also believe that all private schools should be seen to provide opportunities to financially underprivaledged students to attend and receive the benefits that a CAS school education provides, not only in sport, but in all aspects of education, music, drama etc.
Our role as parents, who ultimately are the custodians of the cash flow that ensure these schools survive and continue their primary role of providing good quality students who become leaders for our society, need to ensure that the balance between sporting success and other equally important endeavors that a CAS school experience provides does not get out of wack.
The ball is in our court.