The Chosen
Fred Wood (13)
Indeed- a couple are right there within the Knox staff ranks!
As I said in a previous post, I think the win was a good exemplar for the CAS as a whole. It showed that professionalising sports programs doesn't necessarily guarantee success, which hopefully might (but is probably unlikely to) cause some parents to ask why they're forking out buckets of money to pay for professional coaches that can't beat teams coached by teachers.
This is hardly tall poppy syndrome - it's simply an argument against the professionalisation of high school sports in the CAS because it's not a level financial playing field. Professionalising sports programs is obviously more open to some schools than others, and while it may make those schools feel good it does nothing for the viability of the CAS as a whole.
By the way, claiming that Knox is a tall poppy is also a bit of a misnomer; given they're currently 4-2 it's not exactly a stellar year so far. Particularly given the resources expended - not sure that the shareholders at Wahroonga would be that happy with the half yearly profit report.
Well said formerflanker; very true, but another point .... wouldn't a school who would hire a full time rugby coach also recruit talented rugby players through scholarships?
How much of the equation includes recruitment ?
While we're on slippery slope arguments, why wouldn't the school that employs a professional coach be giving their players performance enhancing drugs and trying to cheat in other ways?
This is a ridiculous argument.
Why would anyone suggest that? and I haven't read about any 'cheating' accusations, just advantages/disadvantages. The discussion is about individual schools' sporting/rugby programmes. I'd still like to know how many sporting scholarships are granted by the individual schools.
This discussion started because the 'amateurs' Waverley defeated the 'professionals' Knox.
Well said formerflanker; very true, but another point .. wouldn't a school who would hire a full time rugby coach also recruit talented rugby players through scholarships?
How much of the equation includes recruitment ?
Because you already made the leap that if they're employing a professional coach they're also bringing in kids on sporting scholarships. The two things are completely separate issues. That is the point I was making.
Poor choice of words or Freudian slip?Good luck to those 4 boys; they couldn't care less about these discussions; their job is to play the game and enjoy it. I'm not suggesting anything; I'm asking. If they were recruited on sporting scholarships, then good luck to them again. Or did they turn up in Year 11 because they/their parents were looking for better opportunities?
I'm simply inquiring (call me inquisitive), and not just about Knox but all CAS schools.
Poor choice of words or Freudian slip?
If it's their job,then they shouldn't be there.
Cas 1s going down to ISA 35-33.
Cas 2s defeating country 38-8.
Any reports on the games? standouts? possible NSW selections?
Cheers fanatic.