5 points to make to responses to my prior comment
I'm a barker old boy EyesWideOpen, so yes i do support them, and it seems your a keen knox supporter, but your information is flawed, as in round 5 last year against Barker at Knox home, Kitchen was definitely playing in Knox 2nds and perhaps got a run in firsts, but i didnt see because i left early, you probably know the reason why... So no, Kitchen didn't have a secured 1's position by game 3
The Good Old Days - no i wasn't at the Waverly v Barker game
Peace Keeper, I don't think anyone posting on this website can possible say they have seen more than one game of every team considering there's only been 4 rounds, and the chances are you're all following the teams you support anyway.. I saw Trinity vs Waverly, so yes i've only seen 1 trinity game.. I agree, sure, having a shoulder injury is going to influence your throwing game, but if you can tackle on it then you should be able to throw a ball with somewhat decent aim, considering you would have been practicing it constantly for countless hours... Also I further base my information on reputation from previous years, until this year I had never heard of a hooker named Morsello
Davis displays great talent, which is typical of a player who makes 1sts in year 10, but no he is not better than patterson, nor clunies-ross and Haltmeier is a far better candidate on the wing, which is obvious from games last year (where Davis and Haltmeier both played on the wings), and also the Barker v Aloys game this year.
I mean no offense and am doing my best to remain unbiased, but i just fail to see how a Barker side that is the only remaining team undefeated could only have 3 candidates for CAS 1's (Jenkins, Wilson, and Flaherty are the only ones I've seen mentioned in most posts), and even these seem to be under scrutiny (Farley and Creely instead of Flaherty, Morsello Kitchen and Booth instead of Wilson, and Whittaker instead of Jenkins).. It is truly beyond me