My early CAS Side
1. Aisea Aholelei (W)/Hugo Heyman (C)/Dane Wilson (B)
2. Billy Pollard (B)
3. Malachai Hawkes (T)
4. Oliver Buchanan (T)
5. Ollie Hughes (K)
6. Oscar Cheal (K)
7. Lachie Bible (C) /Marco Morretti (W)
8. Miller Pelesasa (T)
9. Tas Smith (C)
10. Sione Vuki (T) /Ronald Volkman (W)
11. Peter North (C)
12. Sam Rechner (K)/Lathan Hutchinson-Walters (W)/Jaymesson Ieremia (T)
13. Levi Milford (W)
14. Kyle Galloway (B)
15. Spencer Spalding (A)
Think the toughest to pick will be the prop, with Hawkes a guarantee and the other up for grabs, as well as centres if all players are injury free.
Second row is tough to pick as there are no stand outs but these are the notable tall timber men at the moment.
Back three as always very contested. Cheal deserving a spot, Pelesasa if he is injury free and have heard of Bible's talent, but unsure yet.
Halves I believe are strong, Knox halves pairing of Constable and Fitzgerald is likened but I believe Constable to be a little overrated and despite Fitzgerald's strong kicking game, Vuki covers anyone in defence and has good control in attack.
Back three has some speed on the wings, not sure if Spalding will play fullback but I believe hes gotta be on the park in the midst of the difficult 12 selection.
Might have left a few out that I'm unsure of so please no harsh criticisms, simply open for discussion.
runningrugby its good to get the discussion moving, so, respectfully - no harsh criticism from me.
Nevertheless, I disagree with the mix of players there if the side were to be picked today. The trial form will be what the selectors will be looking at - not reputations. Common sense says that who you played against will be taken into account.
Therefore, I can't see Trinity, who had a low scoring draw with Shore, struggled to get over Oakhill, and pulled out of playing last weekend altogether, having 5 players out of 15 in the CAS #1 team. As an example, if Vuki has good control in attack, why did they not score more points against those 2 very weak teams? Knox put 70 on Oak Hill and 50 plus on Shore, while Barker put 65 on Oak Hill and 75 on Shore - seems like their 10's must have more control in attack than Trinity's?
Aloys just got over the top of Shore's 2nd XV, then straight after on the same field Barker destroyed Shore's firsts. So if Brook battled to beat Aloys then really where does that leave Cranbrook's pre-season wins against third-tier teams like TAS, Grammar, Pius and Gregs??? Consequently, 4 Cranbrook players in the CAS firsts seems unfeasible at this point.
Really, the GPS team will come from J, K, S, N, and I. Barker played 4 of them, Waverley and Knox 3 of them. Players who have performed against these teams will surely be the yardstick for the #1 CAS team. You can probably take a few more chances with the #2 team.
Spalding is Aloys best, but he is a 12, not a 15. There are specialist 15s - eg Vass at Barker who has scored bagfuls of tries and has the required speed to play in that spot. Spalding has a massive boot, is a good goal kicker and defender, and plays the ball well at the advantage line. He does not have the speed of other contenders to play wider out.
#7 has to be Breden from Knox or Wheals from Barker - tough proven performers against the best opposition.
The #10 would surely be between Volkman from Waverley and Ovenden from Barker- both have unlocked the GPS defences with their running game. Who has the better kicking game, vision or passing game? I don't know. Ovenden has a wonderful long and short passing game to complement his speed. Volkman has played alot of centre before this season due to his amazing footwork and powerful running, so they might both end up in the team.
So, if it was picked today, I would expect 12/13 starters out of the CAS 1s to come from B, W, K.
CAS 2s would be much more of a spread of representation.
Of course - there are 2 rounds of CAS before selections for the boys from T, A and C to prove the trial form wrong. Which I am sure they will be fired up to do!! Bring on round 1.