FairWeatherAussie
Ted Fahey (11)
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...o-lead-lions-to-australia-20120822-24muz.html
Shirley, Dean's position has to be getting close to untenable now.
Since the professional era there has been an unwritten rule, you don't ever criticize the selection of any team-mate, no matter how bad they might be. I don't think I've ever heard any player criticize the selection or status of another of their teammates. It's just not done, and it's not very clever either.
Likewise with coaches. No matter how bad a coach considers his opposition coach, it is just not good form and not clever to try to put that coach down with anything more than a tv sound-bite. I don't think I've known of any criticism except that done in a cautious and respectful way. Henry's "I don't think I'd be coaching the AB's if I'd lost to the Wallabies ten times in a row" or whatever he said exactly about Deans, is the only one I can think of the verged on being close to disrespectful. I'm sure someone could contradict me by finding comments made by opposition coaches about PDV, there must have been several. But even with PDV I can't remember offhand any big put-down by other coaches.
Which makes the joking contempt that Gatland holds Deans even more exceptional. It's easy enough for all of us on GAGR to say that Dean's selections and gameplan were terrible, we have nothing to lose. But for Gatland to say the same thing and to joke that he shouldn't last another week is hugely risky for himself. Gatland's not stupid. He knows that even with terrible selections and a bad gameplan, Australia are still capable of matching the Lions. So to make a statement as bold (and self-immolating as that if they lose), he has to be very, very confident that either Deans will not be coaching the Wallabies when we they play them, or that if he is, they will walk all over us.
I'm hoping it's the first option.
Shirley, Dean's position has to be getting close to untenable now.
Since the professional era there has been an unwritten rule, you don't ever criticize the selection of any team-mate, no matter how bad they might be. I don't think I've ever heard any player criticize the selection or status of another of their teammates. It's just not done, and it's not very clever either.
Likewise with coaches. No matter how bad a coach considers his opposition coach, it is just not good form and not clever to try to put that coach down with anything more than a tv sound-bite. I don't think I've known of any criticism except that done in a cautious and respectful way. Henry's "I don't think I'd be coaching the AB's if I'd lost to the Wallabies ten times in a row" or whatever he said exactly about Deans, is the only one I can think of the verged on being close to disrespectful. I'm sure someone could contradict me by finding comments made by opposition coaches about PDV, there must have been several. But even with PDV I can't remember offhand any big put-down by other coaches.
Which makes the joking contempt that Gatland holds Deans even more exceptional. It's easy enough for all of us on GAGR to say that Dean's selections and gameplan were terrible, we have nothing to lose. But for Gatland to say the same thing and to joke that he shouldn't last another week is hugely risky for himself. Gatland's not stupid. He knows that even with terrible selections and a bad gameplan, Australia are still capable of matching the Lions. So to make a statement as bold (and self-immolating as that if they lose), he has to be very, very confident that either Deans will not be coaching the Wallabies when we they play them, or that if he is, they will walk all over us.
I'm hoping it's the first option.