Brumbies v. Crusaders - 2011R04
- Thread starter Brumby Jack
- Start date
- Status
louie
Desmond Connor (43)
The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
Bloody hell, what a pants down thrashing this is. How's that sacking of the coach thing working out for the Brumbies now?
AngrySeahorse
Peter Sullivan (51)
Dagg is over! Saders all over it. I know he didnt let go of AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), I said his defence was good, ya know the part where he chased him down and put him down (didnt mention anything about the infringement).
The ref has been bad. But the Brums have been worse. Saders 52-10.
Slim 293
Stirling Mortlock (74)
This sums it up.
Rea is supposedly skills coach?
What skills?
The Brumbies had opportunities early on but there's too much dropped ball and sloppy passes...
W
WB3
Guest
Before I go to watch the Rebels, I thought I would say:
The Brumbies were shit.
Details later
The Brumbies were shit.
Details later
Slim 293
Stirling Mortlock (74)
I think you might've completely missed my point.
Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
All I can say is what a poor showing from the Ponies. That was 3rd Grade V 1st Grade and the Crusaders rested two of their first 15 forwards.
Just to ask the question, has the knock on Law been changed? The lead up to the try from SBW has to be questioned the ball was clearly tapped forward twice by Ellis and even though it was regathered is this not an intentional knock on? I remember Campo getting penalised for this very thing and having a joke with the ref about it.
I should also thank the Brumbies for helping my tipping, result plus margin of 20 (didn't expect the 2nd half capitulation).
Just to ask the question, has the knock on Law been changed? The lead up to the try from SBW has to be questioned the ball was clearly tapped forward twice by Ellis and even though it was regathered is this not an intentional knock on? I remember Campo getting penalised for this very thing and having a joke with the ref about it.
I should also thank the Brumbies for helping my tipping, result plus margin of 20 (didn't expect the 2nd half capitulation).
Brumby Jack
Steve Williams (59)
Defence coach....allegedly
Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
Isn't he supposed to be Head coach - when Larkham and Caputo let him wear the hat, if Giteau, Hoiles, Moore, and Elsom haven't hidden it.
AngrySeahorse
Peter Sullivan (51)
As I see it I dont think the Brumbies performance has anything to do with Rea, this is due to the players.
Ideally, to fix the problems at the Brumbies would require a massive clean out and not just some of the players.
As I have said elsewhere - I dont feel sorry for the Brumbies but I do feel sorry for their supporters because getting massive changes at a team usually only come about when massive beatings like the one the Brumbies got tonight happen and happen regularly. Otherwise if they only just get beaten they can bring out the old "we are building" or "we are almost right" etc which is fair enough for the Rebels but the Brumbies for all their experience this isnt an excuse. Plenty of pain for Brumbies supporters if they want changes, it's only going to come if their team is getting smashed week in week out for a bit.
Ideally, to fix the problems at the Brumbies would require a massive clean out and not just some of the players.
As I have said elsewhere - I dont feel sorry for the Brumbies but I do feel sorry for their supporters because getting massive changes at a team usually only come about when massive beatings like the one the Brumbies got tonight happen and happen regularly. Otherwise if they only just get beaten they can bring out the old "we are building" or "we are almost right" etc which is fair enough for the Rebels but the Brumbies for all their experience this isnt an excuse. Plenty of pain for Brumbies supporters if they want changes, it's only going to come if their team is getting smashed week in week out for a bit.
Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
Just my earlier question which I think has got lost.
"Just to ask the question, has the knock on Law been changed? The lead up to the try from SBW has to be questioned the ball was clearly tapped forward twice by Ellis and even though it was regathered is this not an intentional knock on? I remember Campo getting penalised for this very thing and having a joke with the ref about it."
"Just to ask the question, has the knock on Law been changed? The lead up to the try from SBW has to be questioned the ball was clearly tapped forward twice by Ellis and even though it was regathered is this not an intentional knock on? I remember Campo getting penalised for this very thing and having a joke with the ref about it."
- Status