Maybe they should go it alone with their own OTT rugbychannel. 100 bucks for the season. Then deal with OS broadcasters direct.
I find it very odd indeed that somehow Foxtel seem to have the higher ground here. Unless I've missed something, they are in a very similar position to RA - struggling for viability with a product that peaked in the late 90s.
Maybe they should go it alone with their own OTT rugbychannel. 100 bucks for the season. Then deal with OS broadcasters direct.
Good for existing fans, if it included overseas comps as well. But no good for attracting new fans.
Chicken and egg, Hoggy. It has always been a low value sport domestically, and for much of our history it has been low value as an international sport.
We have next to no chance of creating a viable, and interesting, domestic competition in the forseeable future. It seems to be that the international dimension is still our biggest selling point.
The international dimension in terms of Test Rugby has always been the biggest selling point. Super Rugby has always been the poor cousin offering little to no actual value to the deal. Which really does ask the question. If there's no value in Super Rugby rights. Then why persist? Wouldn't it be better to cut off the limb and look to other avenues instead? Ones that might actually down the track deliver that value?
The international dimension in terms of Test Rugby has always been the biggest selling point. Super Rugby has always been the poor cousin offering little to no actual value to the deal. Which really does ask the question. If there's no value in Super Rugby rights. Then why persist? Wouldn't it be better to cut off the limb and look to other avenues instead? Ones that might actually down the track deliver that value?
Super Rugby is how you have the baseline of professional players.
It would be fantastic if there was another avenue to achieve this but it is far from simple.
Never suggested it would be simple. In fact, it would likely require a rather substantial overhaul of the game at the professional level to achieve. But if most if not all of the revenue that sustains that base line of professional players in the country in terms of TV is derived from the Test arena then opting to pursue other options wouldn't be all that much different with the exception that we may establish something that could build into something of worth in the future.
I think a point to remember is that yes the TEST arena brings in the value, but it does that in a way on the back of compromising the domestic market, yes Super rugby may have little value. But that is due in a great part due to pretty much 20 years of being compromised by Test rugby and not being allowed to change that.
The question is given the ability to adapt and change to suit market demands what potential value could a properly supported domestic game achieve. Yes Test rugby brings in the $dollars, but again at what cost. In fact i would argue, we know what that cost is because the game in Australia is what you get.
The domestic rugby market has had little or no value in terms of generating revenue for the entire history of the game in Australia.
Domestic rugby around the world is subsidised by the international game and/or private owners with deep pockets.
But the point is you can't run if you never learn to walk. We know the domestic market has little value here, but have we ever tried to change that, NO. And whats so wrong with private money, maybe we should try that, you ever know.
Super Rugby is how you have the baseline of professional players.
It would be fantastic if there was another avenue to achieve this but it is far from simple.
But the point is you can't run if you never learn to walk. We know the domestic market has little value here, but have we ever tried to change that, NO. And whats so wrong with private money, maybe we should try that, you ever know.
But the point is you can't run if you never learn to walk. We know the domestic market has little value here, but have we ever tried to change that, NO. And whats so wrong with private money, maybe we should try that, you ever know.
Hoggy are you really suggesting that we should go down the 'private money' path again? That 'maybe we should try that' - really did the Melbourne Rebels private ownership fiasco that was Andrew Cox escape you?