Gillys_ghost
Dave Cowper (27)
It seems to have dropped off a bit though since the NZ commentators started calling the fans out on it. But your'e right that definitely is personal.Dunno the continual booing appears to be personal to me
It seems to have dropped off a bit though since the NZ commentators started calling the fans out on it. But your'e right that definitely is personal.Dunno the continual booing appears to be personal to me
I don't think Fatprop was excusing the backs. But if the pack is so ineffectual, you will never, ever beat the ABs regardless of the backs. Because they will be under intense pressure and shut down. Neither group did well. The relentless focus on the backs and blithe disregard for the forwards in this thread is quite odd.Gee I think in the vast majority of games I've watched the 10 is ALWAYS under pressure when exiting. Most are up to it. It is his job. He chooses whether to kick it or not, based on whether it is likely or not likely to be charged down. Foley's kick was just another example of HIS poor execution.
Obviously it was also the forwards who made TK drop the fucking pill in contact, twice I think.
I am OK with the forwards taking their share of a loss but plenty of credit must be attributable to the mighty backs
I don't think Fatprop was excusing the backs. But if the pack is so ineffectual, you will never, ever beat the ABs regardless of the backs. Because they will be under intense pressure and shut down. Neither group did well. The relentless focus on the backs and blithe disregard for the forwards in this thread is quite odd.
So, any idea when the team will be out?
I'd rather see Coleman in there than Simmons if we think Adam is the future at lock.
I think they can see a possible solution in the backs. Eg. Cooper for Foley.
It's more difficult for the forwards. Only rookies to choose from. Eg. Drop Simmons for Coleman - probably still won't do much as I don't think anyone here would expect Coleman to come out and be anything more then be solid/average. No way he'll be able to match Whitelock / Rettalick.
Read beat Hooper to that first lineout because he was two feet in front of Hooper and the throw wasn't close to going over him, not because Hooper is short.
Wallabies great Stirling Mortlock on current team: Can't scrum, can't lineout, can't tackle, can't kick
"There's set piece issues, there's defence issues, there's breakdown issues, there's kicking issues . there's not many good things going on currently," Mortlock said.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/.cant-scrum-cant-lineout-cant-tackle-cant-kick
Ah the ramblings of a great Wallaby BACK
What the fuck would he know about forward play !!!!
Wallabies great Stirling Mortlock on current team: Can't scrum, can't lineout, can't tackle, can't kick
"There's set piece issues, there's defence issues, there's breakdown issues, there's kicking issues . there's not many good things going on currently," Mortlock said.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/.cant-scrum-cant-lineout-cant-tackle-cant-kick
Ah the ramblings of a great Wallaby BACK
What the fuck would he know about forward play !!!!
Hmm, you really think you need to be an expert to identify that the Wallabies sucked last week?Wallabies great Stirling Mortlock on current team: Can't scrum, can't lineout, can't tackle, can't kick
"There's set piece issues, there's defence issues, there's breakdown issues, there's kicking issues . there's not many good things going on currently," Mortlock said.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/.cant-scrum-cant-lineout-cant-tackle-cant-kick
Ah the ramblings of a great Wallaby BACK
What the fuck would he know about forward play !!!!
I don't think Fatprop was excusing the backs. But if the pack is so ineffectual, you will never, ever beat the ABs regardless of the backs. Because they will be under intense pressure and shut down. Neither group did well. The relentless focus on the backs and blithe disregard for the forwards in this thread is quite odd.
Cant agree: at least one reason why the ball had the thrown so low - low enough for Read to get it - was that Hooper's hands would always be a foot lower than a proper jumper's.
The only alternative is to lob it over Read and, no doubt, they's pick that off because of its hang time.
if we are at the point of defending having a hobbit jump (or be lifted) in a line out we're truly fucked.