Sober(ish) thoughts.
Generally consider myself to be a somewhat reasonable person. Try not to buy into the hype or drama too much.
So having said that here is a complete over-reaction:
Watching the All Blacks play test rugby is counter to the desired sporting experience. Simply, sport is about the contest.(1) The struggle between two groups of people to see who can win.
The All Blacks win. There is literally no point investing any time or money (god don't spend money) in watching a test match which involves the Darkness.
We wernt just beaten last night. It was men agaisnt boys. And lets be honest. It always is. 90%+ win ratio and two world cups in a row. It's not that the Wallabies are particularly bad, its that we have to play a team that is in a different league.(2) Three times a year. Including our 'blockbuster' opening match in the heart of rugby territory. Talk about killing interest.
The Ireland series, whilst lost, was brilliant. It was tight, no one could tell the winner until the last minute.(4) A genuine, entertaining contest.(4) When was the last time there was a genuine contest involving the All Blacks? An exhibition match in the US or a 3rd Bledisloe dead rubber?
I'll continue to support the Wobblies but I'll never watch a test match involving NZ again. It's irrational. As far as I'm concerned 2nd is first in the rugby championship.
Edit: i turned down free tickets last night and I'm glad i did so. The $10 i paid to watch norths play represented better value.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
1) You have this statement spot on. The competition is all. I don't care so much for the result it is how the game is played that is my concern, winning or losing looks after itself if a team plays well you can be satisfied.
2) Totally wrong. The Wallabies are a poor side. Poor in skills execution across the board, poorly skilled in key positions such as Folau's inability to kick, Phipps inability to pass consistently, Foley's relatively poor kicking game …….. The Wallabies are very poorly coached. The skill deficiencies of "star" players have been extremely well documented but they have made absolutely no improvements to those deficiencies. This is coaching, either in the fact that they cannot teach the players or the players are non-receptive. If the later I don't care if an Israel Folau is able to jump high, he is not a 15 and therefore should not be selected in that position. The actual tactics the Wallabies play went out in 2002 when Macqueen retired and the endless recycle game was getting penalised (rightly so) out of the game. Rugby is not League, lateral passing with one out runners from one side to the other with the only support runner being a single player looking for the in tackle offload is not a genuine attacking threat to a well drilled defensive side.
3)The Wallabies did not play well in tests 2 and 3 - and not because they lost, the issues around the set piece were there in those games, with different players, so the issue is not the personnel so much as the lack of coaching ability.