It goes back to the point about how dumb to have to expect the players to be.
If somebody brings back a drug test positive to cocaine are we going to so, oh they weren't told not to get on the rack? No of course not.
Why do professional athletes need to be told they shouldn't engage in what would be legitimately described as a binge drinking session, during a test week, prior to a recovery day?
Would they not be aware it's not good for them? Would they not be aware it would impede their recovery?
Of course they would be aware, so why does it need to be spelt out?
Although my memory of the incident is somewhat hazy, I don't think the term 'binge drinking session' is appropriate at all.
My recollection was that only a few players were on the turps, and many of the fifteen suspended had only had a couple of drinks.
The issue was about the timing of their actions, not so much what they did.
.