I've been thinking more about Hamish. He's such an interesting study in a certain type of corporate Australian.
He's so desperate to be loved and appreciated. It reminds me a lot of what Joe Aston used to write about in the Fin Review every day, a certain class of CEO that over time becomes completely untethered to reality. This excerpt from his final column I think applies:
These people are often just the highest-paid person in the building. I mean, if Twiggy wants to be crazy, at least he’s got his name on the door. The ones who are completely deluded are the ones who’ve just commando-crawled to the top of the steaming pile and then expect us to adore them. You haven’t taken any risk pal, you’ve just lucked in! That’s the other inopportune truth about this caper: luck plays a huge role in business, though you’d never know it from the heroic self-narratives of chief executives.
It’s never enough, either, to be recognised for your commercial acumen. That’s the soulless part of the capitalist endeavour. You also need to be loved for your charity patronage and your (highly selective) corporate social responsibility. You can’t just be Mr Profit, you’ve got to be Mr Altruism, Mr Community. The desire to be feted is all a part of the rarefied delusion state.
So many of his interviews, comments and missives during and after his stint as Chair can be summarised in that final sentence.
It's why he's always ready to tell us he didn't take a salary as Chair during COVID. I was just a volunteer, doing it out of the goodness of my own heart! He's not only a savvy businessman but he's a good person too. A great person actually.
Of course the game consists of thousands upon thousands of volunteers, many of whom put in many more hours for far less reward (and column inches) than our Hamish. But I'm not sure he even knows they exist.
And while I have joked about it, him taking credit for Joseph Sua'ali'i's game against England is just galling. It's revisionist history on so many fronts.
He wasn't some secret that Hamish boldly uncovered. We've wanted him since he was 15. And it wasn't like getting him was the result of some savvy business, they just made a big cash offer. I could have done that.
Nobody was unhappy we signed him and the vast majority of people were excited to see him play. There was some grumbling about the price but realistically they were in the usual corners. So to cast this as some sort of risky decision that nobody believes in is delusional. Likewise the idea that JAS will single-handedly turn the game around.
Funnily enough, there was a decision that Hamish made that was seen as risky at the time - the decision to sack Dave Rennie and appoint Eddie Jones as coach. But that one seems to have faded in Hammer's memory to the point where it's never mentioned anymore. Funny that.