• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Australian Rugby / RA

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
I've just been holding out for prices to go down. Hoping that the initial price set does attract enough people and RA will be forced to sell tickets for cheaper closer to kick off if games not sold out.

Looking at the ticket maps for the Sydney games at least I think it is going to be wishful thinking that there will be cheaper tickets available closer to the event.
 

KOB1987

John Eales (66)
Looking at the ticket maps for the Sydney games at least I think it is going to be wishful thinking that there will be cheaper tickets available closer to the event.
Yes, I jumped on and bought a few 'gold' tickets yesterday. I'll doubt I'll get test tickets through regular channels and I don't want to miss the Lions tour entirely so it's really my only chance to get amongst the action.
 

LeCheese

Greg Davis (50)
The funds that have inspired this idea (Future Generation Australia and Future Generation Global) have combined assets under management of over $1.2 billion and are 9-10 years old. So it's not outside the realms of possibility.
Sure - I'd argue that this does not have the same widely-appealing benefit of, for lack of a better term, societal impact to get investors involved - or at the very least, it's far a far more niche market. Hope it goes well for all involved though.
 

Crashy

John Solomon (38)
surely you could get a decent schools comp going in sydney and sorrounds for less then 5 milly.
Yep. But at a fund size of 100 mil, thats only 1 mil in total.
Needs to be a bil to make a difference.
Can a foundation (which receives tax deductions) be allowed to do things like top up pro player’s salaries?
 

Wilson

Phil Kearns (64)
Yep. But at a fund size of 100 mil, thats only 1 mil in total.
Needs to be a bil to make a difference.
Can a foundation (which receives tax deductions) be allowed to do things like top up pro player’s salaries?
It would be the Australian Rugby Foundation that supplies the player top ups, with funding from the Rugby Future Fund and other existing sources. Given they're already topping up player salaries and have been for over a decade I can't see how this would change their ability to do that.
 

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
Yep. But at a fund size of 100 mil, thats only 1 mil in total.
Needs to be a bil to make a difference.
Can a foundation (which receives tax deductions) be allowed to do things like top up pro player’s salaries?
This is how Folau, Pocock and presumably JAS receive their payments
 

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
Intresting voting:

Chair vote

Round 1

Benazzi 21
Rinaldo 9 (eliminated)
Robinson 22

Round 2
Benazzi 25
Robinson 27

Simple majority required

Robinson = English speaking block + Oceania

Rinaldo = Italy + Ireland + Scotland (don't want to vote for either of the others)

Benazzi = non-english (including Arg + SA).

Second round looks like Ireland probably voted for Robinson in the end......
 
Last edited:

LeCheese

Greg Davis (50)
I don't think I've heard that but you may be right?

We can probably find out when the ARF publish their accounts
There was a recent update to suggest that the anonymous JAS backer was one of McLennan's buddies (via the foundation) - once McLennan was gone, so was the money, leaving post-McLennan RA to find the cash elsewhere.

All of it absolutely reeks.
 

LeCheese

Greg Davis (50)
I have no idea if this is any good but it will piss off that Tier2 asshole on twitter so I’m happy with it.
Happy to be corrected, but I think Robinson (at least on the surface) proposed more wholistic changes to the game and its management - Benazzi's focus seemed to be more regional, specifically looking to growth in Africa.

To me, it seems like a good outcome.

Edit: I should also mention that it seems a very wise move to elect someone so involved with concussion research at this current point in time
 
Last edited:

wamberal99

Jim Clark (26)
Happy to be corrected, but I think Robinson (at least on the surface) proposed more wholistic changes to the game and its management - Benazzi's focus seemed to be more regional, specifically looking to growth in Africa.

To me, it seems like a good outcome.
Fantastic.
 

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
From a wholly selfish point of view, it's great news. Robinson will, within reason, help support the game here. He supports the nations cup which should get Aus a larger slice of the (bigger) pie.
 
Top