Now that the media hysteria regarding the signing of a talented young player, I think it's fair to say that many rugby people are operating under some outdated stereotypes.
The first being that because of it's greater international presence, that rugby offers more opportunity that league. Superficially this is correct and it was certainly correct in the amateur era. However, it's now a very outdated and naive view because young talented players from both codes are able to secure league or union contracts with British, French, Italian and Japanese rugby clubs and Super Rugby franchises in Australia and NZ and move back seamlessly to the other code. Sam Burgess, Israel Folau, SBW, Ben Teo and many others, including a significant number of Fijians and Polynesians as well as anglo-Australians who move in and out of the NRL to pro rugby and back again.
The other stereotype seems to be that GPS, CAS and other independent private schools are all full of rugby players who want to become lawyers, accountants, doctors etc, while the state and catholic schools are full of leaguies who will go on to become tradies, garbos, wharfies and labourers. Again this thinking is outdated. As league players have become more highly paid, many have the same educational aspirations for their kids as everyone else, so many put their kids into GPS or other private schools but the kid's first preference is league they just happen to play rugby at school because it's the code on offer. But again all or most of these kids move in and out of league and union during their young years.
In the undignified frenzy over one kid, nobody in rugby seems to have even noticed this
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/yo...-teen-stars-to-nrl-deals-20200804-p55iji.html
This brings us to the uncomfortable truth that the league grassroots youth and junior player development system is light years ahead of rugby where there is a prevailing view that the schools can handle most of it.
Junior representative rugby in NSW is pretty much the same as when I played juniors in the 1970s, kids played for their local club (which are now known by the quaint name of 'village clubs'), there's a district rep team picked which plays in a carnival over the long weekend in June. In fact if anything this set-up has regressed since then because with the advent of Sunday local juniors, there is far less of an opportunity for the district rep teams to play trials in the leadup to the tournament. Participation in this representative process is limited only to boys who play for a village club. Suggestions for change are ignored, one of the reasons being that it's in the interest of certain parents to keep to pool of kids small so that their own boy can get in. This is another problem - most if not all of the selectors and coaches are parents with boys trying out.
In the 1970s, junior league broadly speaking followed a similar style of process. However some time ago league changed the way they did things. Their junior rep programs involve open trials from about 12s onwards - so any kid in Sydney (or NSW for that matter), whether they play junior league or not can nominate and attend. Even if kids do play junior league, they aren't bound to trial for their own district. So what happens is that there is a much larger and wider pool of kids trying out. They might start off with 150 kids and there's a process of fitness and age appropriate strength training and testing as well as skills training and testing. At various points the squad is reduced until they get to the number they want. A percentage of the kids that they attract come from a union bakckground, but it they are good enough they are then part of the league junior development system. Additionally the league junior rep comps have a 2 year window which further concentrates the talent. Also no parents are allowed as selectors or coaches.
So even kids who come to GPS, CAS, ISA etc schools are already in the junior RL development system before the schools get to them.
The next uncomfortable truth is that league provides many more opportunities for kids leaving school than rugby does. 3 NRL clubs in Qld, 1 in ACT, 1 in Melbourne and 10 in NSW. It broadly reflects where the kids come from, so that even if they don't get a start with their local club they might with a club nearby.
5 pro-rugby teams just isn't enough to give enough young talent a reasonable chance of getting a start. Even if our systems were world's best practice, it's impossible to identify and give opportunities to all the kids leaving school that we want to. Add to that that NSW and Qld produce between 80-90% of the players, but have 40% of the professional rugby teams located in those states.
5 x 5 TT under a season long model is a road to nowhere for Australian rugby. It may provide a short term fix, but its funding will be reduced and it is incapable of addressing the core systemic problems which hold rugby back in Australia.
It would be far better to have a 10 team domestic pro or semi-pro competition based on established clubs or groups of established clubs (not the NRC/ARC models of frankenstein forced partnerships or soulless franchises based on nothing), at the conclusion of which there is a tournament involving NSW, Qld and Combined States who play in a round robin. The top team (or the top two of the three) compete in a Champions League against the top 2 or 3 of SRA and South Africa.