I can understand the dislike of the 'corporate speak'
I also don't know what the alternative is. The recommendations in the report certainly weren't heavy in corporate lingo and jargon compared to some. What would the report look like if it was considered to not be corporate speak? Presumably it would sound unprofessional and the only way it would have any credibility would be if it reflected the personality of the person who wrote it who was trusted for their advice.
I also don't understand how a report like this would be any more specific or detailed.