Dan54
David Wilson (68)
I was judt suggesting that as way to clear it before test season, the trouble with more games (longer season) it would put finals smack in test season.We need more games cutting the amount of teams doesn’t help that
I was judt suggesting that as way to clear it before test season, the trouble with more games (longer season) it would put finals smack in test season.We need more games cutting the amount of teams doesn’t help that
Sounds a great idea, 4 Aus teams left (assuming Rebels go broke) could play each other 4 times and follow it with a final series?? Could heighten the interest no end.Can I answer that? [All]
I 100% agree with you on that. We need to drop the salary cap for each super rugby side and accept that the best players will ply their trade overseas. Keep the 5 teams so that Super Rugby is filled with young players trying to make a profession out of the game with a smattering of older professionals. That way Super Rugby almost becomes that third tier that we all want and accept that the second tier is principally Europe.I think that is a fair assessment - and the Aus Rugby Union Players will need to take that on-board; they are paid too much in Australia for a sport [in Australia] that can't afford them.
They should, though, have the choice to ply their trade overseas - as it is not that they are overpaid globally [same maybe, but supply/demand will sort that out quickly], just in the AUS Market-Place. RA will need to change its overseas player policy, and we have to admit that domestic rugby union may need to be without some star players in the Australian Market - just like happens in Europe, where some decide to play overseas.
Transfer fees requires the buying out of contracted players. That shit already happens. Media's understanding is that the SRU got 6 figures in Euros for BK's move to Toulouse.And implement a transfer fee system…
At a certain level that makes sense - part fee to the player, part fee to the Club. That way, the Club [should] then invest in the next crop of talent, funded by their efforts in developing the transferring player.....easier said than done though.And implement a transfer fee system…
Have people forgotten, or don't know about, Terry Hill and transfer fees? In short, transfer fees have been declared to be a restraint on earnings and haven't been a thing since around the 1980s. Or has there been some legal change that I'm not across?
I remember Terry Hill getting done poaching other peoples lobster pots on the central coast.Have people forgotten, or don't know about, Terry Hill and transfer fees? In short, transfer fees have been declared to be a restraint on earnings and haven't been a thing since around the 1980s. Or has there been some legal change that I'm not across?
Hill was about the draft system used by the AFL and adopted by the ARL during the 90's I think.Terry Hill? Possibly Dennis Tutty.
It's done pretty consistently in League when an NRL team wants a Super League Player. Not sure if the rules change when its coming from the UK but some players haven't come because the Club has asked for too much.Have people forgotten, or don't know about, Terry Hill and transfer fees? In short, transfer fees have been declared to be a restraint on earnings and haven't been a thing since around the 1980s. Or has there been some legal change that I'm not across?
The top 50 earners for rugby globally would also be on that. Apples to apples.With the AFL set for the top 50 earners to all be on a million plus in 2025. Rugby really is a long way back
In the context of Australian rugby though.....
There'd be what, 5 or so? Hooper, TT, Rory Arnold, Skelton, Banks
Maybe a couple of others?
In terms of percentages the top 50 AFL players is the top 7.5% of the league (assuming a 37 player average squad size). For Australian super rugby I think it's a 35 player squad (excluding EPS/WTS players), so across 5 teams that's 13 players. We wouldn't have that many on over million locally, probably a max of 3-5 players, depending on the year.In the context of Australian rugby though.....
There'd be what, 5 or so? Hooper, TT, Rory Arnold, Skelton, Banks
Maybe a couple of others?
Hoops wouldn't still be on $1m would he?
QC (Quade Cooper) (Quade Cooper) & Genia would go close
In terms of percentages the top 50 AFL players is the top 7.5% of the league (assuming a 37 player average squad size). For Australian super rugby I think it's a 35 player squad (excluding EPS/WTS players), so across 5 teams that's 13 players. We wouldn't have that many on over million locally, probably a max of 3-5 players, depending on the year.
Factoring foreign players probably doubles that, again depending on the year and availability at the time - Adam Coleman for example was on over a million when he left but at some point swapped his eligibility to Tonga.