Half, My issue with this is that we dump an underwhelming comp and develop a local comp based on what? This seems to me to just be another solution to our current position and holds nothing for building Aus Rugby but rather taking it down to a level just above club rugby AKA the NRC.
That's a NO! from me..
All depends on perception, EPL, NFL [US Gridiron}, AFL, all have national domestic competitions, all have different competitions formats.
If fact most successful sports / codes have national competitions.
We currently have five teams, mostly populated with Australian based players, if we jumped to 8 to 10 teams we need heaps more players, an argument could be to follow other international codes like basketball and football and bring in overseas players to help fill the gaps.
The key hhhmmmm main issue, important, critical, essential, thing is to do a non Australian Rugby decision, rather than like the NRC was a top down Pulver and before Flower decision from wo to go inside six months. The model chosen must include debate negotiation by all stakeholders.
Once the model is chosen, it will need to be developed and this I think is at the heart of your question, having chosen a model how does Super Rugby fund it,
The simple answer Super Rugby does not fund the new model, the new model whatever it is will need private capital investment to fund it and develop it. Thats why it will take 18 to 24 months to get the model.
Super Rugby's role is mostly to maintain some interest in rugby and keep a pool of players.