The_Brown_Hornet
John Eales (66)
It probably is as simple as that. We've got a goal of where we want the game to be in 2027, let's just work backwards from there and every decision will be in service of bringing that about
Without saying it, it appears to at least be a move towards centralisation. Similar with intentions about the third tier.In a practical sense.. what does this change, what does this mean. Is Rugby Australia now in charge of all player contracting?
In a practical sense.. what does this change, what does this mean. Is Rugby Australia now in charge of all player contracting?
A bit hard to filter out the consultant, but it would appear RA is managing Super contracting, and Super clubs have more of a hands-on influence in the top levels of Club rugby?In a practical sense.. what does this change, what does this mean. Is Rugby Australia now in charge of all player contracting?
The changes will see RA lead the National High-Performance Plan and system, which includes national pathways and development programs, National Teams across XVs and Sevens and contracting players and key high-performance staff within Super Rugby Pacific, Super W and national programs.
Meanwhile, the clubs will be responsible for local talent development and pathways as well as the delivery of Super Rugby Pacific and Super W programs aligned with the plan as the Member Unions focus on the delivery of the community game.
Should really be the Allan Ala'alatoa's down to the Dane Zander's.Sounds like an improvement in line with other market leaders.
when they say Rugby Australia will lead the ‘National High Performance Plan’ does that mean every super rugby player is inclusive of this plan, or is this only applicable to players that Rugby Australia deem of national significance?
my question is, will Rugby Australia only focus on the PONIs through this; or are they leading the contracting of all players from of your Taniela Tupous down to your Dane Zander’s. Or does your Dane Zander-esque player fall under local talent development. I just wonder where the line in the sand is.
**sorry to Dane Zander
Statements of support from:
RUPA
NSW Waratahs
Qld Reds
ACT Brumbies
Western Force
Excellent.
Next, I'm looking for connectivity and support from and to the community game where Member Unions will continue to oversee and deliver the Community game. Particularly, what is the state of support in NSW? My perspective is that the SRU have increasingly wanted to be seen as the Community game leaving Subbies with "WTF?". There is an apparent need for better cohesiveness between NSWRU and SRU. And to do this without isolation of Subbies. The attitude from SRU is key here. That then follows to development pathways between club and "the professional game" (I hate the term "third tier") - to tie-in the support (or sabotage) from the SRU through to the franchises.
Great post Reg. I love this last para too - it’s how I’ve seen myself with rugby for a long time. I’m an Australian rugby fan first and foremost - Wallabies and Reds come later but my main love is the game and it’s overall health here. But I'm a nobody - I really hope the various powerbrokers across the game all get on board with this attitude too. It’s like that old management principle - disagree sure, then commit.Look, don't read too much into the statements of support. I know a few aren't completely sold while others still pushing for some caveats. But its good strong leadership by Rugby Australia and I think it needed to happen. The game is becoming increasingly irrelevant in this country and anyone who thinks drastic change isn't needed is kidding themselves. Even if some clubs think they can do it better themselves, it's no use doing it better yourself if there's no one else to play and the sport becomes a hobby activity. Much like the statements said elsewhere about kiwis really wanting Australia to get strong again.
I remember hearing a QLD Cricket staff member talk some years ago and she was very clear on her role - she worked for cricket in QLD, not for QLD Cricket. That has to be the perspective of our teams / states - we need to work together to make the code strong again.
What would be the negatives of this move? Why would people not be supporting it?Look, don't read too much into the statements of support. I know a few aren't completely sold while others still pushing for some caveats.
Do I feel a limited edition GAGR merch drop coming on?we need to work together to make the code strong again.
What would be the negatives of this move? Why would people not be supporting it?
Because why would you let Rugby Australia - who came up with the $999 limited edition RM Williams ball - anywhere near your commercial department?What would be the negatives of this move? Why would people not be supporting it?