Set piece magic
John Solomon (38)
I expect there would be some unintended consequences of this change S. Throws could be directed well beyond the outside shoulder giving the opposition no chance at all of competing for the ball whether they jump or not. Otoh, the opposition could counter by jumping for everything (probably as they should), but really not with intention to compete, so that any crooked throws are called back.
Rather than allowing some of the scrum freedoms to apply to the lineout, I'd rather see the scrums be policed as strictly as the lineout throws now are.
I take your point but I think that the behaviours wouldn't quite go this way - for example, if a team just continuously contests for the sake of it, they'd expose themselves to a maul without defenders ready to stop it getting momentum. Teams also know they can't just aim for outside shoulder because if someone goes up (which has a decent probability) it's still immediately getting called. I reckon that it just stops frustrating breaks in the game for small reasons. Possession is supposed to change hands in that environment because the opposition weren't given a chance to contest - i think it's pointless handing over the ball for this issue when there is no real 'advantage' gained from it