Wamb, like you seem to of done I have spent years in rugby admin, from Junior level in NZ, to senior there (on provincial union etc, to senior over here in Australia, I was on committees, coached, managed teams the lot, I know I wasn't always right, all I and every person I worked with at every level just did our best. I still believe in general administrators at every level do.
I was at a pub in NZ when I was on provincial rugby union, listening to some of our rep players absolutely giving it to those old bastards running the union (they didn't know me as one) because we insisted we got rep jerseys returned after they decided they should be able to keep them, and that we were struggling to find money to keep the union afloat with costs that ranged from U14 rep teams through to them.. Had club players doing same expecting that they should be able to have any number of things that the club should always provide. Very seldom in all my years of administration and the crap I received form junior rugby on, were the crtics coming from a position of knowing how we had to work within rules/laws of both rugby and the country.
Oh and on the Union and clubs I was on almost all board members were like me ex players!
Just for the record: I have never said that 'ex players' per se should not play a role, or only play a very limited role, in helping, running, furthering, supporting the code in this country and at whatever level. Such a stance would be ridiculous but it seems to have suddenly evolved into a type of straw-man here.
What I do believe is that, in the established elite networks of the code in Australia, it has been too easy for a relatively small group of like-minded persons (of similar social backgrounds), including some well networked ex-players, to perpetuate an insular, in-bred, unimaginative, and, yes, 'elitist' mode of governing the code. These elite networks have tended to mistake their own rugby passions and self-reinforcing views regarding the code for the type of leadership essential to sustaining a football code in the Australian sports marketplace.
The consequence of that mode, inter alia, has meant that the governing elites within our RUs (a) have typically been detached from the motivations and rugby-loving preferences of the 'everyday' rugby fan and, worse, (b) have not possessed the skills, backgrounds and openness of thinking essential to defining strategic paths by which rugby can be maintained and enhanced in code market share terms and in fan viability terms.
Just look at the state of the code today, QLD and NSW struggling to win games with undistinguished teams playing with ordinary-to-poor skills levels, imported coaches all over the place as we have not grown enough of our own, the Rebels in a state of high fragility team and business wise, awful crowd and media-watching numbers, the Wallabies, what, 6th or 7th in the world rankings following a truly mediocre RWC...........and so on.
Do we really think that the historical modalities and micro-cultures of the ARU/RU and the State RUs have nothing to do with this appalling state of affairs? That there are no common themes of gross historical governance inadequacy running through this tawdry 2020 sporting reality? That it's all just random unfortunateness and some kind of inescapable black hand of fate?