hoggy
Nev Cottrell (35)
The problem with that, is that it's the stakeholders with the most clout that are draining the game.
Yes, The SMH article highlights this, those directly receiving those funds are the ones most likely to resist change.
The problem with that, is that it's the stakeholders with the most clout that are draining the game.
The problem with that, is that it's the stakeholders with the most clout that are draining the game.
I will argue vehemently the short term cash grab has led to much of this mish,mash we have now.
I’m still hoping Castle can deliver the goods. This from the Canberra Times has me somewhat concerned: “Fairfax Media has learned that Castle has enlisted the services of Nielsen Sports consultant Michael Tange to map out what Australia's Super Rugby involvement should look like in the next broadcast cycle, 2021-2025.”
Pretty sure Pulver was at Nielsen.
I hope she’s not falling into the old boy’s network.
Edit: he was http://www.nielsen.com/au/en/events/2014/consumer-360/bill-pulver.html
The market is confused.
It even does gender equality?The old boys network is omnipresent.
It even does gender equality?
Catherine McGregor might see this as a way of overcoming her relevance deprivation disorder.
I fixed your post.Multiple diversity boxes could seemingly be ticked with one appointment.
Meanwhile, according to The Weekend Oz, the Victorian Government is going to pony up a good wad of dollars to finance a "centre of excellence" for the Storm.
One of the best run sporting clubs in the country.
The whole structure of game is confused, and in fact dysfunctional. Multiple layers of petty administrators each defending their turf, elite and junior rep programmes which stand outside and are at best loosly connected to other parts of the game and on it goes.
In Sydney as an example, district and sub-district clubs which are in the same geographic area operate completely in isolation and are part of completely separate and often hostile bodies. (The Sydney Rugby Union and the NSW Suburban Rugby Union.)
As I've noted before, we have an administrative stucture based on 19th century colonial boundaries. In England all clubs affiliate directly with the RFU.
But as we are often told, rugby in Austrlia is uniquely unique, nothing which applies to rugby anywhere else in the world is applicable here and nothing which succeeds in any other sport in Australia could poosibly work in rugby. And we just keep going around in ever diminishing circles until we'll eventually run into ourselves in the centre.
Just have a think about the sports (some of which are smaller and have less resources than rugby) which run a national club competition. Then think about how many other sports in Australia participate in a transcontinental, multi-timezone competition in which teams are invisible to supporters and potential supporters for weeks at a time. And you'll have an answer which no one running rugby in Australia wants to even think about let alone acknowledge.
Are they paying their own way? from what I understand even with 20k members they need hefty injections of cash to stay afloat.
This team is not in the ballpark of the top afl clubs with huge memberships.
Someone is paying their way, and no matter who that someone is the club is one of the most professionally run outfits on and off the field.
Curiousier and curiouser...
The Western Force really didn't have a chance!
https://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/we.-ng-b88806001z
RA aid saved RebelsThe Sunday Times - Perth - 15 Apr 2018 - NICK TAYLORRUGBY Australia money helped clear the debt that saved the Melbourne Rebels and effectively signed the Western Force’s Super Rugby death warrant.The revelation comes after this week’s RA announcement of a $3.8m loss for 2017, citing the messy axing of the Force as one of the factors.Confidential documents obtained by The Sunday Times show the Australian Rugby Union — now RA — agreed to pay former Rebels owner, New Zealand businessman Andrew Cox, $300,000 and then-director Peter Sidwell $200,000.The money was then paid to the Rebels.The payments, contained in a Deed of Settlement Release, relate to “disputes” with the Rebels over RA’s threats to axe the Rebels and directs the money to the Melbournebased club.The documents also state two other directors Lyndsey Cattermole and Bob Dalziel “gift” the Rebels $250,000 each. The combined amounts effectively cleared the Rebels debt of $789,811 that allowed Cox to sell the club to the Victorian Rugby Union for $1 under a Put Option agreement, effectively spelling the end of the Force as the Rebels could then not be closed.The document says, among others, Cox and Sidwell “had suffered loss and damage as a result of statements alleged to have been made by or on behalf of the ARU on and from 10 April 2017”.On April 10, RA chairman Cameron Clyne said a decision on which team would be cut would be made after consultation with the Force and rebels.Four days later the Rebels issued a statement saying they “unequivocally” rejected that RA could “chop or cut” the club and had notified it of its intention to seek compensation.The deed of settlement says Cox and Sidwell: “. respectively direct that the respective payments to them be paid to MRRUPL for the purposes of MRRUPL satisfying the Debt Free Requirement and MRRUPL agrees that these payments will be used solely for this purpose”.It also says Cattermole and Dalziel promise to the ARU “. they have each gifted $250,000 to MRRUPL for the purpose of MRRUPL satisfying the Debt Free requirement and MRRUPL agrees that these gifted amounts will be solely for this purpose”.Cox used the put option and sold 11,625,000 Rebels shares to the VRU on August 4 for $1.RA and the Rebels did not respond to questions.
Probably time to remove your wallabies icon, they are just another foreign team representing an organisation that not only doesn't support us but also actively tries to destroy us.