• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Australian Rugby / RA

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
1733791466468.png

Some good target in there
 

Ignoto

Peter Sullivan (51)
Interestingly enough the wording around the RWC is "final weekend" i.e. the 3rd/4th play off is the same weekend. So they're aiming for a top 4 finish, which given what happened in 23 is a lofty goal!
 
  • Like
Reactions: dru

Wilson

Phil Kearns (64)
A 70% win rate... have we ever managed that?
That's across all teams in gold - so likely combined win rate for Wallabies, Wallaroos, and the 7s teams (possibly age grade teams too). The page of the report detailing it even has a picture of Madi Levi on it:
1733793958208.png
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
I have a couple of mates who've done the Level 3 coaching program and it sounds more like a compliance exercise than actual criteria to be building stronger coaches.

Not sure if the process has changed over the past few years but the semi-intensive practical element followed by the theory/written element doesn't seem overly effective.

Wouldn't it be better to have the entire program unfold over the course of 6 to 12 months and actually upskill across a variety of targeted areas?

If a Level 3 coach is supposed to be the equivalent of a Masters/Doctorate why not actually make the study/practical elements take time to properly develop the key skills. People can't go off and do an MBA over a weekend.
 

oztimmay

Tony Shaw (54)
Staff member
Level 2 (now, community coach) consisted of a 2-day course, 60-hour coaching diary, and a mentoring program. Mine was spread over 18 months, mainly because I couldn't line up a time with my mentor.

It's part compliance, but I did learn a lot from my course. One of my old blindspots was I said "I" too much when giving instruction - fixed that :)

Also reaffirmed my belief to cut out the chat before a training drill and just got straight into it. No one volunteers their time to hear any coach waffle on for 10min before a drill.
 

Mick The Munch

Vay Wilson (31)
That's across all teams in gold - so likely combined win rate for Wallabies, Wallaroos, and the 7s teams (possibly age grade teams too). The page of the report detailing it even has a picture of Madi Levi on it:
View attachment 20887
What you describe is what the RFU have done so the CEO can get his bonus - Mens had a 57% win rate, Womens 98% - the aggregate was 75% meant Bonuses were paid - worth a watch -
 

Wilson

Phil Kearns (64)
What you describe is what the RFU have done so the CEO can get his bonus - Mens had a 57% win rate, Womens 98% - the aggregate was 75% meant Bonuses were paid - worth a watch -
Not quite. Aside from a number of other cases of fuzzy accounting on targets, the RFU altered the terms after the fact, and specifically excluded top flight games in New Zealand for "reasons". It's also heavily influenced by the dominance of the Red Roses, something which wouldn't be relevant to us. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with targeting a combined winning rate across the representative teams (though I would prefer them to have individual team winning rates listed as well).

Executive bonuses are another story, but it's worth noting that 60% Sweeney's bonus was tied to financial targets, rather than on field factors (they didn't actually meet those targets but gave it all to him anyway lol). Again though, the problem there isn't the targets, it's pretty clearly the creative accounting around them and bonuses.
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
This might be the unpopular opinion, but the articles I'm reading about RA being super keen to keep Schmidt and are considering 'getting creative' with his tenure by potentially allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do. The only situation I can see happening is a head coach of the national team having more time away that is going to end up with decreased results and disconnection between him and the players.

I understand his family situation (well at least what has been revealed in the media) and I think if his family is the priority, let him worry about that and transition away from Wallabies coach. We all knew that might be the case and if his family needs are outweighing his need to coach the Wallabies, such is life.

It will only hurt is own reputation as well if they give him all these extra allowances and the Wallabies start to tank.
 

Strewthcobber

Simon Poidevin (60)
This might be the unpopular opinion, but the articles I'm reading about RA being super keen to keep Schmidt and are considering 'getting creative' with his tenure by potentially allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do. The only situation I can see happening is a head coach of the national team having more time away that is going to end up with decreased results and disconnection between him and the players.
Will make a lot of workaholic highly paid HCs a bit nervous if the Wallaby's results continue to improve though
 

Dctarget

Tim Horan (67)
This might be the unpopular opinion, but the articles I'm reading about RA being super keen to keep Schmidt and are considering 'getting creative' with his tenure by potentially allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do. The only situation I can see happening is a head coach of the national team having more time away that is going to end up with decreased results and disconnection between him and the players.

I understand his family situation (well at least what has been revealed in the media) and I think if his family is the priority, let him worry about that and transition away from Wallabies coach. We all knew that might be the case and if his family needs are outweighing his need to coach the Wallabies, such is life.

It will only hurt is own reputation as well if they give him all these extra allowances and the Wallabies start to tank.
I understand what you mean, but HC of a national team is a pretty weird role. By Australia's nature, you're going to be living 1000kms away from 70% of your player pool no matter what. Does he need to go to every super game live? I think he could easily be based in NZ for a lot of it.
 

Ignoto

Peter Sullivan (51)
allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do.
What type of periods are we talking about?

Given a large portion of the year, the players are either on holiday, preseaon or Super season, I can see there being very little need for Joe to be in Australia. He and the Wallaby staff can jump on weekly calls with all the Franchises in the same way they could if he was based on the GC like Rennie.

He can pop over every X amount of weeks to run through with players in person specific things if needed, but most of the time I'd imagine they're all sitting infront of a screen analysing something.

Given we're not the richest country (or sporting code in Australia), we probably need to think outside of the box when it comes to attracting the best talent.
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
WRT the "green to gold" plan:

Participation growth: To increase support for clubs, schools, coaches and match officials to enable growth in participation and strengthen the rugby community.

Lovely.

Perhaps we can start by scrapping the Rugby Australia "Participation Fee" that costs me $1000 per grade per annum. I can use that for recruiting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dru

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
What type of periods are we talking about?

Given a large portion of the year, the players are either on holiday, preseaon or Super season, I can see there being very little need for Joe to be in Australia. He and the Wallaby staff can jump on weekly calls with all the Franchises in the same way they could if he was based on the GC like Rennie.

He can pop over every X amount of weeks to run through with players in person specific things if needed, but most of the time I'd imagine they're all sitting infront of a screen analysing something.

Given we're not the richest country (or sporting code in Australia), we probably need to think outside of the box when it comes to attracting the best talent.

He is the first Wallaby coach to not relocate to Australia from what I understand and already is doing what you're saying above and jumping back over the ditch a lot, same goes for some of his assistants.

So yeh, I am not sure what additional leave periods they mean.
 

Wilson

Phil Kearns (64)
He is the first Wallaby coach to not relocate to Australia from what I understand and already is doing what you're saying above and jumping back over the ditch a lot, same goes for some of his assistants.

So yeh, I am not sure what additional leave periods they mean.
Have RA actually said anything about increased leave or flexible work as head coach, or is it the media speculation around it?

From what I recall any chat about Schmidt staying on but with more flexibility has been from the media, but looking at Schmidt transitioning into a Director of Rugby or assistant role, supporting a new, first time head coach coming into the role.
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
I think Schmidt and RA might have earned a bit of trust on this one Phil. I see what you're saying and of course we don't want a part time coach.

But the benefits of stability and Joe's coaching IQ outweighs some of the risks, I think.

I love Joe - Vote 1 Joe, so definitely don't take this as some type of anti-Joe agenda.

My concern is what I've highlighted there - stability.

I agree RA and Joe have earnt a fair bit of goodwill in this situation, there is clearly some good chemistry within the playing and coaching group. But you also don't want a scenario where the team are slacking when the substitute teacher is handling the camps and standards potentially drop.
 
Top