Strewthcobber
Simon Poidevin (60)
Some good target in there
That's across all teams in gold - so likely combined win rate for Wallabies, Wallaroos, and the 7s teams (possibly age grade teams too). The page of the report detailing it even has a picture of Madi Levi on it:A 70% win rate... have we ever managed that?
Ah, that old chestnut.One of my old blindspots was I said "I" too much when giving instruction - fixed that
What you describe is what the RFU have done so the CEO can get his bonus - Mens had a 57% win rate, Womens 98% - the aggregate was 75% meant Bonuses were paid - worth a watch -That's across all teams in gold - so likely combined win rate for Wallabies, Wallaroos, and the 7s teams (possibly age grade teams too). The page of the report detailing it even has a picture of Madi Levi on it:
View attachment 20887
Not quite. Aside from a number of other cases of fuzzy accounting on targets, the RFU altered the terms after the fact, and specifically excluded top flight games in New Zealand for "reasons". It's also heavily influenced by the dominance of the Red Roses, something which wouldn't be relevant to us. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with targeting a combined winning rate across the representative teams (though I would prefer them to have individual team winning rates listed as well).What you describe is what the RFU have done so the CEO can get his bonus - Mens had a 57% win rate, Womens 98% - the aggregate was 75% meant Bonuses were paid - worth a watch -
Will make a lot of workaholic highly paid HCs a bit nervous if the Wallaby's results continue to improve thoughThis might be the unpopular opinion, but the articles I'm reading about RA being super keen to keep Schmidt and are considering 'getting creative' with his tenure by potentially allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do. The only situation I can see happening is a head coach of the national team having more time away that is going to end up with decreased results and disconnection between him and the players.
I understand what you mean, but HC of a national team is a pretty weird role. By Australia's nature, you're going to be living 1000kms away from 70% of your player pool no matter what. Does he need to go to every super game live? I think he could easily be based in NZ for a lot of it.This might be the unpopular opinion, but the articles I'm reading about RA being super keen to keep Schmidt and are considering 'getting creative' with his tenure by potentially allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do. The only situation I can see happening is a head coach of the national team having more time away that is going to end up with decreased results and disconnection between him and the players.
I understand his family situation (well at least what has been revealed in the media) and I think if his family is the priority, let him worry about that and transition away from Wallabies coach. We all knew that might be the case and if his family needs are outweighing his need to coach the Wallabies, such is life.
It will only hurt is own reputation as well if they give him all these extra allowances and the Wallabies start to tank.
What type of periods are we talking about?allowing extra leave periods to be with family, seems to be the wrong thing to do.
Level 2 (now, community coach)
What type of periods are we talking about?
Given a large portion of the year, the players are either on holiday, preseaon or Super season, I can see there being very little need for Joe to be in Australia. He and the Wallaby staff can jump on weekly calls with all the Franchises in the same way they could if he was based on the GC like Rennie.
He can pop over every X amount of weeks to run through with players in person specific things if needed, but most of the time I'd imagine they're all sitting infront of a screen analysing something.
Given we're not the richest country (or sporting code in Australia), we probably need to think outside of the box when it comes to attracting the best talent.
Have RA actually said anything about increased leave or flexible work as head coach, or is it the media speculation around it?He is the first Wallaby coach to not relocate to Australia from what I understand and already is doing what you're saying above and jumping back over the ditch a lot, same goes for some of his assistants.
So yeh, I am not sure what additional leave periods they mean.
I think Schmidt and RA might have earned a bit of trust on this one Phil. I see what you're saying and of course we don't want a part time coach.
But the benefits of stability and Joe's coaching IQ outweighs some of the risks, I think.