Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
One thing that is not a surprise is we can't name a bench. The novelty on this has worn off - Why is it so hard?
Hey we used to name a 24 - so this is changing shit up a bit.
One thing that is not a surprise is we can't name a bench. The novelty on this has worn off - Why is it so hard?
Being a Brisbane game its curious that a couple of QLDers were dropped.
I would have liked to see Higgers get a crack at 6 too. I tend to think it's his best position at test level.
I reckon it's so the ARU can email their membership base an extra time in the week.
Whats a little frustrating is that we appear to have the pack right, but the backs take a step back. Previous week you could argue it was the other way around.
Hey we used to name a 24 - so this is changing shit up a bit.
Being a game we ought to win, and on the understanding TK might benefit from a rest, then I'd rather see how Hodge would go at 13 than to revert to the 2115 model of Horne in the backline.
Always thought Cheika was future thinking, but that's ridiculous.
Don't forget about the 2104 Super Rugby champion NSW Waratahs!
Likewise and agreed.