You asked for evidence for why I hold that view, and I gave it. You don't have to agree with my assessment, but you don't get to make up things that I said.
I don't want to go back-and-forth, so I'll leave it at this. You spoke in very absolute terms about Hooper's leadership:
Your captain simply must have respect and Hooper is *not* respected.
I'm not sure you have the evidence to back it up. When asked to do so, you put forward a lot of vague statements about how previous captains were better, but really didn't base it on anything much.
It's classic keyboard warrior stuff. You're fine to believe it all you want, though.
.