• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Australia v England: Match III, SCG, Sat 16th July 7.55pm AEST

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tah Man

Larry Dwyer (12)
Gordon is a good player. But Tate is potentially a match-winning finisher.
Agreed, I expect Tate to come onto the bench.

Other changes I would have is Slipper to start with Tupou. Bell on the bench with AAA.

Frost and Phillip in the row. Wilson 6 with Hooper and Valetini. Leota (reserve 2nd rower) and Samu off the pine.

Backline to remain the same except for Hodge coming in at fullback for Petaia. Ikitau and Vunivalu in 22 and 23.
 

Members Section

John Thornett (49)
Agreed, I expect Tate to come onto the bench.

Other changes I would have is Slipper to start with Tupou. Bell on the bench with AAA.

Frost and Phillip in the row. Wilson 6 with Hooper and Valetini. Leota (reserve 2nd rower) and Samu off the pine.

Backline to remain the same except for Hodge coming in at fullback for Petaia. Ikitau and Vunivalu in 22 and 23.

Isn't Len injured?
 

PhilClinton

Mark Loane (55)
I was wondering this. Is it perception or are people really starting to drop quickly.

Studies are being run in a few other sports (NBA for example) around increased injury rates. They seem to support the idea that modern athletes are getting injured more often and are looking at ways to mitigate that, for example shortening the number of games played in a season (NBA play 82 regular season games) or changing the format to have a mid-season tournament which also becomes a longer break for some players.

I don't know the science behind it, but part of the reason in rugby would also be players missing games to concussion protocols, that wasn't really around a few years ago and adds to the 'injury' counter.
 

qwerty51

Stirling Mortlock (74)
I really don't know but I wonder if it's all the gym work players do these days. It's just more load on the body.
 

Fireworks

Jimmy Flynn (14)
Hopefully we’ll see Harry Wilson finally rewarded for his super rugby form with a starting spot this week
 

Marce

John Hipwell (52)
Personally I'd roll the dice and see how Wright and Vunivalu go at 14 and 15. We aren't going to lose this in the outside backs anyway. Hodge can ride the pine and come in if/when we need him. He covers every slot to some extent.
This is what I said. Add Leota as lock to prove Wilson in the backrow. I'm not sure if I'd pick Leota as a starter lock or on the bench.

Could be something like this:

4 Philip
5 Frost
6 Valetini/Wilson
7 Hooper
8 Wilson/Valetini

19 Leota

Second option:

4 Leota
5 Philip
6 Valetini/Wilson
7 Hooper
8 Wilson/Valetini

19 Frost
 

Marce

John Hipwell (52)
Not really, Ringrose, Byrne and O’Mahony to miss the 3rd test.
Johnny Sexton went off injures in the 2nd test and battling to be fit for the 3rd
4 players is a common number for this kind of tours. We are talking about disasters like the Wallabies one
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
Volume is volume, you can't tell me players aren't doing more strenuous exercise whether it's gym, field training or games than in previous years.

Of course players are doing a lot more. In my day we trained twice a week, no gym work. The keener of us did some running in our own time. The players are valuable assets and professional trainers are supervising their workload. You are welcome to your opinion, but I think I will wait to hear what the experts say. If anything.
 

LeCheese

Greg Davis (50)
Of course players are doing a lot more. In my day we trained twice a week, no gym work. The keener of us did some running in our own time. The players are valuable assets and professional trainers are supervising their workload. You are welcome to your opinion, but I think I will wait to hear what the experts say. If anything.
ask and you shall receive https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755824/
Edit: two more https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33046453/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28525884/

In sum, the jury's out a bit still as the data isn't great, but it looks like incidence is remaining pretty stable, but severity is increasing. By nature, more training/game time = greater likelihood of injury
 

molman

Jim Lenehan (48)
ask and you shall receive https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755824/
Edit: two more https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33046453/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28525884/

In sum, the jury's out a bit still as the data isn't great, but it looks like incidence is remaining pretty stable, but severity is increasing. By nature, more training/game time = greater likelihood of injury
Doesn't this align with the protocols world rugby released around the number of hours of contact training? or was that solely predicated on concerns around concussion?

The paper while interesting points to a need for more analysis. I'd be curious if there is variance between this English data and Australia where we've typically had harder, faster tracks than up north.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top