I'm not sure about that he was sharing the bench lock role with Timani. Given Timani's departure and then Douglas' form this year he would have to feel comfortable being in the 23 (which is as good as the XV in terms of payment).
Well, when Simmons has accumulated nearly 40 caps because he's a "lineout general" but not much else, you have to wonder.
Before the roar of banjos becomes deafening: Simmons' Super Rugby form was good enough, he suits Links style of game plan at that level, and clearly he can run a lineout (despite the fact he's shown no real talent for stealing other peoples' ball).
BUT at Test level I want a second rower to have a physical impact in the tight, and Simmons falls short of this compared to Douglas. We can fire back and forth over this if you like, but the simple fact is, if you go and watch the two of them hit rucks, its pretty clear who the more physical player is.
EDIT: I also think Douglas (and his management) have it right in their heads to go now. After RWC2015, the French especially are going to be running amok through the SH looking for talent.
Douglas goes now, gets a presence up there, and then can choose whether he wants to come back and have a crack at the Super/Test arena, or increase his pay packet even further staying in the NH.
This is going to be the world as we know it after the next RWC. Sabbaticals will come in from the ARU unless they find a way to make a heap more cash.
And in retrospect, overpaying players is what got us into financial difficulties in the first place, starting in 1996. So maybe Pulver et al have made the decision that they can't be dictated to by players, and will look after the game of rugby before they look after the talent.
Those talent pathways simply have to get better, and the money is better invested in grassroots to make the base bigger and give us more options.