RoffsChoice
Jim Lenehan (48)
I want it scrapped. I don't care that it gives a pathway for my favourite Aussie players to be in the Wallabies again: they left. The guys that are here are good enough.
It's a decent compromise now, given the fact that so much more money can be made overseas. Why should we force them to choose between making the most of a short career and representing their country?I want it scrapped. I don't care that it gives a pathway for my favourite Aussie players to be in the Wallabies again: they left. The guys that are here are good enough.
It's a decent compromise now, given the fact that so much more money can be made overseas. Why should we force them to choose between making the most of a short career and representing their country?
If they can do the hard yards then they should be able to go overseas and still be elligible.
I'd rather it was based on years served rather than caps though, because then it also becomes a merit issue rather than purely a time served kind of thing. Say 6 years in Australian rugby, straight, before being eligible to be selected from overseas.
The more players that wield this power, the more likely they’d be to change the rules.
To'omua and TPN were required to head back to Leicester in non international weeks, to avoid the fine. It made it a ridiculous situation.
It definitely depends who you are. If you are an 80 cap test player and still in your pomp you can probably demand whatever the fuck you want.Do players want to wield this power though given that it will likely cost them financially?
Negotiating longer release times in their contracts might improve their chances of getting selected for the Wallabies more often but likewise they will take a financial hit to do so. If the rules change in the future and there is a more open policy to selecting overseas players, chances of selection will decrease (as there is more competition) so you might end up negotiating a pay cut which never actually benefits you with Wallaby selection.
Faletau was certainly in a position where he was a walk up starter for Wales and highly in demand for Bath to make additional allowances in order to sign him.
It probably wouldn’t be that much different pay wise if they no they are going to be picked for the wallabies. The match day payment for the wallabies would counteract any financial loss. The risk would be injuries and non selection, but the potential would be worth let’s say a 10-15% loss in wage. You can earn over $100k a year playing for the wallabiesDo players want to wield this power though given that it will likely cost them financially?
Negotiating longer release times in their contracts might improve their chances of getting selected for the Wallabies more often but likewise they will take a financial hit to do so. If the rules change in the future and there is a more open policy to selecting overseas players, chances of selection will decrease (as there is more competition) so you might end up negotiating a pay cut which never actually benefits you with Wallaby selection.
Faletau was certainly in a position where he was a walk up starter for Wales and highly in demand for Bath to make additional allowances in order to sign him.
Except if your name is Israel.It definitely depends who you are. If you are an 80 cap test player and still in your pomp you can probably demand whatever the fuck you want.
Caleb Timu (Reds) joins french club Montpellier.
Started just 3 Super rugby games since playing those tests against Ireland. Was there an issue with Thorn?Caleb Timu (Reds) joins french club Montpellier.
Started just 3 Super rugby games since playing those tests against Ireland. Was there an issue with Thorn?
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...r/news-story/fc9f1625f4293dec52d2f3fc4ec9569bWallabies great Stephen Larkham is set to resume his coaching career in Ireland.
Reports surfacing out of Ireland have the axed Wallabies attack coach to take up the same role with Irish heavyweights Munster.
The Irish Independentreported that Larkham met with officials in Limerick on Wednesday.