The whole point imo of the NRC is not the development of players. It's the retention of players.
Currently for 15 man rugby, there are only 150 professional contracts available with another 25 baseline (EPS) contracts. That's no where near enough for all the rugby talent in Australia, the NRL and AFL would be over 500. This is the reason we lose players overseas before they play Super Rugby because there's no opportunity for them to earn money if they're not in the best 150-175 players in the country but they can overseas. The NRC was/is suppose to offer these type of players a decent wage to entice them to stay.
Sounds a fair explanation, could you also advise what / how and by who these NRC players are being paid, I'm not sure it's been touched on.
Gnostic, I'm with @suckerford and I follow and understand your points. But it's going to require hard work, and support from interested / invested bodies without burying heads in the sand.
Different beasts but if Shute clubs are now turning profits, the NRC clubs could start turning profits, then we need the NRC to start turning a profit.
I mentioned the winner of the NRC playing the winner of the JPN comp over in Japan, I think it could be a money spinner but would at least cover itself. Broadcasting, Sponsorship, and also the yen.
I haven't seen Bill splashing and wasting cash like the ARU has in the past.
As I've said above, could the NRC simply be an advertisement of our best talent and we loose even more players over seas - this is my biggest concern!!! My thought on that is working closely with Japan, possibly having them invest and have a team in the NRC. This maybe attractive to them leading up to their RWC.