I know I'll get my arse kicked for some of the comments below but so be it.
I've got some good friends at the ARU and my below comment is in no way a reflection on them (we all know you're reading this) but fair dinkum, who is the genius that has come up with the idea of having this PNRC (Pulver National Rugby Championship) running with teams from Melbourne and Perth in it?
It is a well known fact, that $3.9 million of the $5 million loss incurred by the ARC was directly as a result of having the Perth Spirit and Melbourne side in the competition.
It is also a well known fact that the Western Force and Melbourne Rebels Super Rugby franchises are running at a $5 million annual loss and both are being bailed out by the ARU.
So can someone please explain the logic behind the likely decision that both Perth and Melbourne will have teams in the PNRC?
Surely the fiscally responsible thing to do to start off this PNRC would be to exclude teams from those 2 cities until such time as their Super Rugby clubs can also be fiscally responsible.
It wouldn't really matter if they don't have teams in the PNRC anyway, all bar one of their Australian eligible Super Rugby Players come from either the Sydney or Brisbane Competitions anyway.
Start off with teams from Sydney, Brisbane and Canberra and grow it over time when public, media and corporate support is on the increase. Then bring in teams from NSW Country, Qld Country until Force and Rebels aren't costing the game $10 million a year in this country.
So my PNRC (or should that be BNRC?) clubs would be:
Year One
Sydney Uni
Sunnybank
Western Sydney (Parra, Eastwood, West Harbour, Penriff)
North Harbour (Manly, Warringah, Norths, Gordon)
Sydney City (Easts, Randwick, Southern Districts)
Canberra Vikings
Year Two
Sydney Uni
Qld Uni
Western Sydney
North Harbour
Sydney City
Canberra Vikings
Qld Uni
NSW Country (Play at Newcastle Number 1)
Year Three
Sydney Uni
Qld Uni
Western Sydney
North Shore
Sydney City
Canberra Vikings
Qld Uni
NSW Country (Play at Newcastle Number 1)
Qld Country
Melbourne (if they can sustain it themselves)
And so on.
I'd also make a rule that if any of the rich, well to do clubs wish to stand alone in the 3rd tier, then they forfeit their right to compete in the SS or Hospital Cup or JID.
That way, we wouldn't get the coalition of the unwilling like we did with the ARC.
And I might add, NONE of it starts off without a hotel sponsor, airline sponsor and coach sponsor being locked in. All games to be played at night so the teams can arrive morning of game, stay 1 night and leave next day keeping costs down.
For the Sydney based sides (other than Sydney Uni) all games played in Sydney to be at a central venue negating the clubs having a whinge that it's not at their field. So training venues can be wherever they like, but for the combined sides for example if a weekend is Western Sydney v Sydney Uni, North Shore v Sunnybank, Sydney City v Canberra all 3 games could be played as a triple header at Parra Stadium (example only). But ideally, in year one they look to play at 10,000 seat venues so when only 4,000 show up, it's still looks ok on the telly.
Unfortunately though, I think the PNRC won't take the softly softly approach a great deal.
My two bob's anyway.