I think you will find that the bookies spread removes any arbitrage opportunity.Wow, we're only getting $6 for an Aussie win.
I wonder if its worth setting up accounts on both sites and laying bets off against each other.
Samo can and has played lock for the Reds. Not ideal but if you want a 4/3 bench that's they way you'd go. The trouble will be running the lineout if Razor can't play 80 for some reason.
Actually, he is the example.I hope you aren't referring to QC (Quade Cooper) with this post. Just think back to the last few years on this forum and what you have said is completely wrong in regards to him. In fact he was treated in quite the opposite way on most occasions.
Simmons is going real well.Why would Hugh Pyle be useful now if he was in the squad? As another loose head lock, he'd be behind Sharpe and Simmons in the pecking order.
Simmons is going real well.
Let's hope Robbie uses the bench more effectively this week.
There's some good reasons not to:I see nine as a specialist position, as I do THP & Hooker. I prefer to see the next best available sitting on the bench.
Actually, he is the example.
people have vociferously defended him no matter the circumstances.
Remember the Test against England? He missed 9 of 11 tackle attempts,yet still had the unquestioning support of the Reds followers.I won't even bother talking about some of the unsavoury incidents that he has been involved in.There must be something in the water up there.
Bench just announced,
S.fainga, j.slipper, r.samo, l.gill, n.phipps, a.fainga, k.beale
Should of seen Mitchell on, when the centres were lacking. We need AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) in the midfield. Enough of last week I guess.I think his bench use was fine in the first game. Certainly far better than most of his time in charge. I don't think Hooper got a run because he had to be saved in case Pocock needed to come off.
Moore and Slipper could have both come on a little sooner but at least they got decent game time.
Beale could have been dragged for Mitchell but I can also see why he was left on. He might have been having a shocker but he is also one of the most likely players to do something amazing and win the game.
Interesting piece by Paul Cully today regarding a cheap shot from Anthony Fainga'a in the first test.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...-of-coasting-is-expensive-20120823-24p1p.html
Both Fainga'a twins seem to really have brought this into their game this year and I'm really not a fan. There is a big difference between being physical and aggressive and just being a dirty player.
Go back over the threads Champ, there was more than one rabid supporter defending the undefendable.Quit the generalisations champ.
One reds fan offering unrelenting support doesn't represent the whole Reds fan base
Interesting piece by Paul Cully today regarding a cheap shot from Anthony Fainga'a in the first test.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...-of-coasting-is-expensive-20120823-24p1p.html
Both Fainga'a twins seem to really have brought this into their game this year and I'm really not a fan. There is a big difference between being physical and aggressive and just being a dirty player.
regardless... 1, 2, 12 or even 100 fans don't represent the whole Reds fan base.. Son don't generaliseGo back over the threads Champ, there was more than one rabid supporter defending the undefendable.
What qualifier should have I used, some or most supporters?Bearing in mind very few if any actually criticised him, which can be argued as tacit support.
But moving along..