• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

2010 Wallabies End of Year Tour (EOYT)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thomond78

Colin Windon (37)
does it really matter if our A team loses? It doesn't effect our IRB Rankings. THere's no trophies on offer. There's no RWC qualifications. Its a development tool pure and simple.

Unless you want to find out just how much of a living hell I can make your collective lives from the morning of November the 17th onwards if they do lose - then yes, it most certainly does. :D
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
So it's ok to lose from here on in?

the mid-week games? I don't really mind. Would much prefer to win as it establishes a culture. But in the end they don't mean anything. The test matches do. So if these games can prepare some of the back up players for test match footy, then they've done their job.
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Unless you want to find out just how much of a living hell I can make your collective lives from the morning of November the 17th onwards if they do lose - then yes, it most certainly does. :D

Why, Mr 1978, would we think you would possibly be annoying and revisionist in any way if your boys happened to sneak a win?:lmao::lmao:
 

Hugh Jarse

Rocky Elsom (76)
Unless you want to find out just how much of a living hell I can make your collective lives from the morning of November the 17th onwards if they do lose - then yes, it most certainly does. :D

Thormond78. I guess your name relates the Munster victory over the Darkness in 1978 12-0 at Thormond Park. I also note that Munster managed to scrape home twice against a very understrength and tired Men in Gold in atrocious conditions at Musgrove Park Cork 11-8 in 1967, and 22-19 in 1992.

Legend has it that the scoreboard at Thormond park still reads 12-0 (unless there is a game on). Is this still true?

Given your earlier posts regarding your deluded desire for a Munster victory over the Men in Gold, would this victory be considered more important than the 78 version, and will your name be changing to Thormond10?

We will graciously subject ourselves to a Thormond inspired "living hell" if the unimaginable happens on November 17, provided there is a forfeit on your behalf when the inevitable Golden victory occurs. What are you proposing for when we win?
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
It is painfully obvious that Deans dislikes players being specialised in playing a position. Instead it appears he picks teams of journeymen and jacks of all trades over specialists. Judging from what S. Finger said in an interview even the Props aren't specialists anymore.
"It's kind of a lottery because the props are nearly all training both sides of the scrum now and everyone in the front-rowis being kept on their toes," Fainga'a said.

This is nothing new for Deans - anyone remember C. Cullen at 13?

I don't think I am alone in wanting players to be the best in THEIR position. If they can also play somewhere else that is a bonus. That is not to say that all players shouldn't be able to do the basics like pass and defend.
 

DPK

Peter Sullivan (51)
Gnostic, what make's you think he want's them not to be specialists? Maybe he's trying to widen their skill base so that they better understand the fundamental parts of the game.

Or maybe he's trying a sort of rugby version of "total football"...
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
yeah, I see no problem in teaching props, in practise in particular, to play both sides of the scrum. I also see know problem with running wings at fullback, in the centres, in at flyhalf etc as you never know when they will need to step into that position during the game.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
Training players in different positions takes them out of there comfort zones, can be useful in improving a players skills
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
I would prefer to see Benn Robinson and Ben Alexander and Moore working their arse off in their correct positions that they will be playing, Alexander plays too little THP as it is.
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
if Ben Alexander stayed in his "correct position" he wouldn't be playing TH for Australia though right?
 

louie

Desmond Connor (43)
Agree gnostic.
To win a world cup you really need your positions sorted. Deans is really starting to piss me off
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Have a look at Dean's teams. I have become even more convinced of this with this squad selection.

In Deans Wallabies only the Hooker is a specialist and if Pec Cowan had proved more able I suspect he would be ahead of S. Finger.

We have known for a long time that Deans wants the backs to cover multiple positions and it looks like he is applying the principle to the pigs as well. At least this explains his penchant for picking players like Ma'afu, Daley, and Edmonds over more specialist players.

Whilst a couple of utilities in a team is a good thing especially on the bench, a full team of utilities is IMO far from a consistent winning combination.
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
Understanding more positions and who they interact is helpful for when you change back to the position you specialise at. This is PARTICULARLY true of props.

If you know what works on you when you play LH then when you play TH you are going to do it.
 

RugbyReg

Rocky Elsom (76)
Staff member
Have a look at Dean's teams. I have become even more convinced of this with this squad selection.

In Deans Wallabies only the Hooker is a specialist and if Pec Cowan had proved more able I suspect he would be ahead of S. Finger.

We have known for a long time that Deans wants the backs to cover multiple positions and it looks like he is applying the principle to the pigs as well. At least this explains his penchant for picking players like Ma'afu, Daley, and Edmonds over more specialist players.

Whilst a couple of utilities in a team is a good thing especially on the bench, a full team of utilities is IMO far from a consistent winning combination.

who are the more specialist players than Ma'afu, Daley and Edmonds?
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
who are the more specialist players than Ma'afu, Daley and Edmonds?

Exactly. Daley is only a loose head, Ma'afu is only a tight head and Edmonds has played all kinds of positions but only hooker professionally.

I would say they are all very specialised.

Obviously these blokes have covered all kinds of positions in their young/club days but professionally they are all pretty pigeon holed.
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Understanding more positions and who they interact is helpful for when you change back to the position you specialise at. This is PARTICULARLY true of props.

If you know what works on you when you play LH then when you play TH you are going to do it.

That didn't help Alexander this year at S14 level, he was one of the most penalised props in the comp.

I would back a team of players the best in their positions in the country, against a team of utilities able to play well in multiple positions any day.

We have discussed at length where some of those chosen rank in the pecking order and players like Ma'afu are a long way down the list in terms of "best" in position so training him out of position is going to help that? In any event the whole thrust of my post is that this push for a team of specialists at least gives a credible theory to explain some of the mystifying selections Deans and Co have made during his tenure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top