Search results

Footyfootyfooty I was making a factual statement, not mudslinging at your Bellevue hill kids. That age group has been at the bottom end of the table since year 7 and they have the compounding factor of Glengary which weakens every Scots 15s sporting team. Hence my summary for the 15s this year...

Joeys ... daylight ... View ... rest. Glengary year and not a strong Scots age group

Scaling new heights …

Might help if the ref hadn't penalised the Tah's to an inch from their scrotes. They dominated breakdown and thought we were loose there but heavily off the back of the ref. Tahs looked better in open play but too mnay turnovers. You're not a Know fan by any chance ...?

Gee what's the penalty count

Not pretty, I'm going back to the rowing

I genuinely am fascinated with the Shore kids thinking they’ve got a look in. Take out the 7 and a couple of others and it is a very limited team. Unlikely to have forward dominance and little threat in the backs. Despite claims to the contrary this age group hasn’t won diddly since the 13s...

While limited context given kids already in Opens, new hires, and individual and program development - the below is the 16s table from two years ago who are the current year 12 cohort. I expect these players will still be the core of this years 1s Scots had 5-6 already in Opens. New dominated...

1 Scots 2 Joeys 3 View 4 Kings 5 Shore 6 New

Spend some of daddy's hard earned on some constructive comments beyond 'Shore da best'! You have three fantastic players but they cant carry the team

Top three of Scots, Joeys and View. Plenty of Shore 16yo here to talk their own hopes up. Scots should win on paper but need to gel on the paddock, a lot backing up from last year.

If you give Shore a +50 start ;)

Nice, but think a stretch for New. View will be higher.

Have a friend as a New ex student who’s on their consulting committee. They still have some core unanswered questions re their building program and land availability which will ultimately impact enrolment numbers. I think the original concept was no reduction in male enrolment but my view is...

Ballsy move, great for their future students. No doubt old boys will focus on diluting sport, whereas this should be recognised as a comprehensive all round education. Too many misogynistic spoilt brats who objectify women still coming out of entitled private boys schools.

Shore boys hooked on that one :)

;) I'd say his predictions are inline with his coaching ability!

Solid seconds team. Another long year for CAS methinks.

Agree, but given 3 of the 4 were there this year and Marshall a strong contender I’d be happy to put a lazy lobster on them getting the gig.

Backrow and 15 are locked in, rest much more up in the air. Fittler and some of the New backs will press for spots, I’ve no idea on tight 5 but could see a lot of different options, be surprised if these names are in the top team.