Search results

Are these tests being played under the ELVs?

You're kidding right?

Fair enough. They dish up good rugby and I've been privileged to see quite a few games in France but they regularly fall into anarchy. It's part and parcel of French rugby.

No. It's not. But there are rarely outright brawls like that. There a difference between hard and the all in brawls seen in Frog. Regardless I still think it's stupid, no matter where it happens

Pathetic. Fucking poofters in pinks swinging handbags. French rugby is a bit of a farce most of the time. I remember going to a club match in Lyon and left at half time with most of the crowd.

heheh Excellent "Who's your coach"

What are you trying to say? Speak up son, I can't hear you. Ok I will rephrase. We don't need another SA or Aus side. Don't be so bloody defensive. It's just logical.

Do we really need another marginal side in the Super comp? Because that is what it will be if its an Aus team. If it were Japan or a PI team at least its something new and interesting. Melbourne WineSwines against the Force / Cheetahs etc? Boreathon.

Uhm, the last three tests?

Yeah, ferocious ain't he? On a serious note I do beleive he is potentially the best 6 in Aus.

I think if they do their homework they will find some really good players in the development squads of the S14 franchises. The other alternative is to look for instance at older props who can play for another three seasons but bring a lot of experience to mentor youngsters? The money could be...

Paarl stop you're making sense again. ;D When oh when do I ever say anything to lead you to believe I don't respect Paarl players? You are losing it because of your obsession with Snorre. Relax mate, I respect the players. The world is not out to get everyone from Paarl. Really. Having said...

Re: CC Rugby Correction. The one is gren and gold, the other mainly Canary yellow. I'll leave you figure out which is which :fishing Back on topic, today Foxtel decide for some reason decide not to thwo the 2 weekly Currie Cup matches. :angryfire: I hope to hell they show some of this...

Maybe Slaptjips couldn't get the backline going because he had no coaching experience? Todd Louden took half a season to get them going so why blame the players? As for "stealing" players, you guys just keep on letting good players go. Hougaard wasn't good enough. The Bulls thought he was...

Lejund of immense proportion. A prop that can make wine. Uebermensch. :)

Viva ama-Snorre, viva ama-Puppet, viva ama-Jesus, viva.

Either you're taking the piss or you simply cannot read. Where did I ever advocate that I prefer a ten man Bulls game? :nta: Because I don't want a helter skelter game defunct of structure? There's a whole range of options in between. But we all know you love the losing WP game they are...

Is the breakdown that much more of a fuckup? I think not.

I was referring to game 2. I am saying the Boks did not go off their feet as much in game 2 because they committed more bodies and cleaned out earlier and more effective. In Game one the Boks were clueless at the breakdown. I don't know what the fuck they were trying to do. In Game 2 we went...

Like you said. You are on your own. I would love to know if the players played an instructed game plan or vetoed it and player their own on Saturday. For now I will leave my judgment to the EOYT. It's going to be interesting.