Search results

Vintage Kiwi ‘strategy’

Are the reds playing the Chiefs or the ADF? Or the Kruger Lion Spotters? WTF were their kit designers thinking!?

Incorrect. Being up there with the best IMO means being in the top 4 in the world, and although we aren’t currently in the top 4 right now we most certainly are up there.

Ok in my defence I have a text on my phone as evidence so I’m just the messenger . Duly noted, will correct. Thanks INP.

I actually have high hopes for the Reds in a minute

I’m not too worried from a Wallaby perspective, it’s our depth that is the problem, our best 23 is up there with the best. But this is easily the worst performance from an Aussie team so far in the TT, and that’s saying something, and it’s a worry <<< Edit: if we are to persist with the TT route...

BTW this is awful in general from the Brumbies

I was thinking the same. I think Slips will be the only Brumbies front rower as a walk up in the 23, won’t surprise me to see Pone, HJH (Harry Johnson-Holmes) or Faulkner kick Alan out. Sio’s days as a Wallaby are over save for the 23 RWC when he might get in as a squaddie on the basis he covers all 3 front row slots.

I’ve resigned to that, but fuck he deserves it and even bigger fuck he has to grab the opportunity with both of those massive hands.

Kings 40-5 over New Kings 2nds also won, 20-10 or something like that. Kings 31-0 over High in 3rds. New 3rds beat Kings 4ths, and their 4ths beat Kings 5ths Kings 16As won, 15As lost

Leaguie instinct, happy to look over it in this instance

Could be a smokie for 13 even, given the dearth of standout options. Paisami would be favourite but that assumes you’re going a combo of JOC (James O'Connor)/To'omua/Lolesio at 10/12. I reckon Rennie will persist with hunter at 12 which means on form it has to be either Ikitau or Perese at 13

Definitely a way to leverage off that in the tests

That was super fun. I’m officially bullish Tahs, not for this year though.

Haha, love it

Kind of. It’s inexperience more than desperation, but a bit of both. Liking what I’m seeing going forward.

I’m No it wasn’t, it was the defenders crap technique.

I am not at all unhappy with this game, very entertaining and on paper it was a jack russell taking on a Rottweiler

I’m hugely in favour of Maddocks at 15, albeit with sky blue glasses. Banks offers safety, but nothing else at test level. Maddocks might be inconsistent but can provide a point of difference. The ABs would target him but that could be at their peril, and they would know that.

Ask Jack de Belin about them