Search results

I think like Hanigan, you can teach better efforts but I don't think you can teach workrate. Someone must be able to teach Hanigan to be better at cleanouts etc etc I am hoping for a more effective, mobile, aggressive pack In Cron I will trust

I have continuing doubts that Holloway will make the match day squad, especially with McCalman rumoured. I also think Staniforth has a very good chance of being one of the starting locks Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Ahh OK, transition from attack to defense is definitely an issue for most sides, our reactions have been getting better as fitness levels improved; and then they turned to shit in the NH To me it is a two step process, one makes less turnovers and two when they happen work your arse off to get...

They all need work at the moment, but this tackling stuff should have been worked out in the sand pits at Super Rugby training years ago, not in Wob camp

Even they move in the pendulum, we often see Folau on the openside wing

Ok, so in a match how often are players in the same position? All I have said is that the defensive alignments are fluid in phase play. There maybe general positioning, but most of the time it is fill a whole and trust the guys around you; and when you get a chance get back to your area. All...

I believe that who stands where on set piece contributes little to that And nothing said above suggests that set piece defense is the issue As to penalties, throughout the SH tests, penalties, YCs etc were low, the NH test has been a different issue I agree the defensive structure in phase play...

This I struggle with, the only valid issue is maybe set piece defense. From then on it is always fluid

i dunno, whoever is chosen won't be able to do everything that is needed

I think the position is highly political and a "two" may not be able to get through change we need To me, there needs to be board changes and that means the stakeholders have to cede power, I don't know if a "two" or "three" could get that done

It will be up to the board, they can choose 1/ someone that "understands" the Aus rugby community 2/ a professional sports administrator from outside the community 3/ a change agent to shake things up Each has their own issues and positives, I would prefer 2, but I think we will get 1

There is always pressure after average losses, but using an anon from the Roar as primary evidence suggests nothing serious so far. Lets see what the new CEO does, nothing will happen until then; and I honestly I don't see many viable Aus options at the moment and I don't know if anyone is...

North Sydney Oval would be good

It is the reason I can get to more games, being able to properly feed and water the boss lets me see more rugby The concept of going to Homebush or say Parramatta is not surprisingly less edifying.

and yet it has real pubs, bars and restaurants within walking distance(unless you go fox studios); whereas the other stadiums simply don't

Or Tui & Enever, just not Enever & Simmons - there was a distinct lack of dynamism

We need more balance in the locks, last week we had two technicians who do a job, just the same job Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

I think it is unreasonable to suggest "Moore is a shit scrummager", actually it is rubbish

He gets to rest next week