Search results

Gordon by >15 Norths by <15 Manly by < 15 Wicks by > 50 Souths by >30 Uni by > 50

I reckon they play too much percentage footy. You have to be physically dominant,or rely on the opposition not turning up to win with that philosophy.

That's a round 3 fixture?

You don't rate the Tahs this year?

Fuck them,they won't be counting any of my tv's as part of their audience. If you take away lower graders and relatives,they wouldnt draw 100 people to this game. I hope Manly put 100 on them,to stop this farce.

Hmm,not sure if it would work,but I'd love to see it. Inman has a fucking big gob when he comes back to Shute Shield.

Huh? It was dealt with behind closed doors,albeit quickly. Apart from what was seen on ref cam,no one involved made any comment on what transpired at all.

I really think you are overthinking his thought processes. In the heat of the battle he heard something and complained to the ref. no different to complaining about someone not rolling away,or some fucking 9 that won't hand over the ball. When things had calmed down,and he had time to think,he...

The thing in Inmans favour,is that the Canes Nonu is not nearly as devastating as the AB's Nonu.

Quoting Parra & the Riff is such a red herring big arse. only one team from the top 5 from last years comp,will have their home ground will be covered. And I disagree something is better than nothing. I predict The Beasties and West Harbour to be closer to fucking hopeless than competitive. And...

I thought Tom Cruise & friends thought they had a cure for it?

Big arse,anyone who has developed fierce loyalty to their club would,as a by product of this loyalty being nurtured over a period of time,carry neglible points. They would not be forced to play elsewhere.

I think it's a bit silly to put the Shoremen,and Hobbits in the same category as the Wicks & Uni ATM. You should remember that there is a finite talent pool. For every recruit that joins the Wicks,it weakens the depth of an already weaker team. if the Wicks have an average score of say 50-10...

I remember nothing from those columns,ever! Not even the feeling of self loathing,every time I click on a link to R ead that drivel.

They turned 21?

I think you are missing the point. Both players made a stand. Pocock lost me,when he made a statement after the game moralising the issue,but claimed he didn't know who the culprit was. I am of the view that he should have either called out the culprit,or given a no comment. This won't be...

I thought Moore was the captain? I don't actually understand what happened. Pocock says after the game that he didn't actually hear it,so he can't name the culprit,but he is outraged anyway. Is that how it happened?

Did Bill Pulver spend any time in Qld 20 odd years ago????

Are they? I just saw a brief statement from the brumbies CEO where he states the culprit is a serial offender. Either it's an important issue and they should name and shame the player. If it's not important enough to name the culprit,shut the fuck up.

Speaking of the break in play,as a grumpy old man it shits me to death. It seemed to me,from my view on the lounge. The ref blows play up and calls a scrum,Tahs water boys stroll on & takeover proceedings everyone stops,has a drink at their leisure and listen to instructions from the box...