Search results

the Assistant referee was the dad of the hooker ... sounds a bit sketchy to me having him making a decision like that at such a crucial point in the game the dad shouldn't be there at all he's a barker dad and shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a flag for a 1sts game

theres no need to get angry lets chill out here

common sense does not over-ride law. the law is the law so it shouldn't have been a try. we can move on no worries we know it's wrong even though you stated that it should have been a try.

"Yes. Should have been a scrum restart." common sense isnt a law unfortunately you juststates it should have been a scrum restart. if common sense was a law then sure but it isn't the law states it should've just been a scrum restart

Waverley 35+ Cranbrook 5+ (home ground + last home game ever for yr 12s *on home ground* make it a hard fight plus from the waverley v knox game last week we can see knox didn't fend aswell against waverley as cranbrook did) Trinity 5+

Something we can both agree on is that this topic needs an unbias opinion from someone like Snort currently it is a barker v cranbrook back and forth and we need an unbias opinion as a final answer we have both put out our arguments lets leave it for an unbias party to chip in.

Obstruction has nothing to do with not joining the mall completely different situation. EITHER way I reiterate my statement that the whistle was blown before the try.

Cranbrook never joined the maul so that in itself is a Cranbrook penalty ... Whistle was blown before the try was scored under no circumstances can that count as a try Realistically we need an unbias opinion from someone like Snort

Barker v Cranbrook incident <<There is the entire incident you see the penalty being blown before the try is scored (Cranbrook had stopped with no chance at controlling the try due to the ball being dead) The Barker players harass the referee demanding that he speak to the touchie which the...