Search results

This ref will let every thing go at scrum tyime then penalise you for doing something right, but he does it for both teams penalties are usually equal:D

Casper I thought Joubert had a good game, Lydiate was offside was in front of the back foot.

Absolutely if we were playing the All blacks they would have put 30 points on us, not taking anything away from your team but. NZ would have been far more clinical, with our limited game plan would have been easy for them, at least you were able to change your game,

I must say the negativity here is amazing, whinging poms huh!! well boys you won and I cant see you loosing the last test with or without Horwill, we don't seem to have a game plan cant seem to bring our strike runners in against you. Played a tight game without having the appropriate grunt, no...

Now I'm relatively calm I can post, I thought the selections were wrong before the game after just confirms it Venupola Youngs Parling didn't quite do it their side of the scrum, no Super Rugby on the bench I thought a big big mistake, Parling brought in for his lineout prowess Umm I missed that, front...

We didn't seem to have a game plan, other than try and win the breakdown and let 1/2 penny kick his goals, no width to our game played it in our half instead of looking for field position, with a 6 point lead we seemed happy to just defend, cant do that, first half even. Second, you cant defend...

Australia the better side well deserved the win.

Appointing a barrister or lawyer is that if there is any doubt, not Guilty will be the verdict, that it took 4 hrs to come to a decision I must assume there was a doubt whether reasonable or not. Therefore if they appoint a further Barrister or lawyer I cannot see how the verdict will be any...

He He, seems like the boys are enjoying themselves,:)

Mowen closed down Phillips, that was his job, in fairness to Hooper was in the 3/4 line for much of the game, I didn't see Palu do that much either

I think the aussies will win this one by 10, No grunt from Parling, cant understand his inclusion.:(

yeah If I should come after you with a shotgun fire twice at you, but miss, the intent was there to do you harm, so I should get the same punishment as if I had hit you. The problem is interpretation SH & NH ref know the same rules but, rugby is played differently in both hemispheres, You play a...

I have no problem with any of the three I mentioned, Youngs has been very good so to Venapola , players coming off the bench will more often than not make an impact, fresh legs against tired ones, If Parling doesn't make the grade who have we got on the bench to tighten things up?? Croft. I'll...

OK I can understand that an Aussie would say it was 50/50, the way I interpreted your post was that if you stamp on someone and there's no damage c'est la vie.

That's a complete misinterpretation of what I said. It is only stamping if you are doing it intentionally. I am saying that if you put your foot somewhere, and we don't know if it was intentional or not, and no damage is done, then it seems fair to give benefit of the doubt because no harm is...

Yeah I don't think there was too much in that, in an interview he said the same thing, just caught up in the moment.

Ahh so anyone can stamp on you as long as there's no damage, AWJ had stitches around the eye a centemiter the other way and we might be looking at criminal damages.

Yes I know he was on the tight side, Youngs is not the best scrumaging hooker and is very light, also venapola is weak in the scrum put those three together and we are in trouble scrum time, AWJ will resume his position behind A Jones, thus leaving Parling on the loose side, Cast your mind back...

I agree with most, its done, now move on, lucky to get away with it but he did.

Don't worry paddy, people cant whine anymore than they are now,