• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallaby Coach after Joe

Who will be the Wallaby coach for the EOYT and the RWC?


  • Total voters
    56

Cole

Sydney Middleton (9)
Have heard a few times if Les goes to the Wallabies job if he could do it and the Reds together. Personally I don't like it and don't think RA would go for it anyway, I do wonder about the merits/possibility of a guy like Zane Hilton being Wallaby assistant coach and Reds head coach together though. Seems a very good coach on the rise and might be a way to keep continuity at Reds and, if he wants, for Les to keep his right hand man
 

PhilClinton

Paul McLean (56)
I can’t see them making the Wallabies job part time. Particularly with this Schmidt situation where he and Cron have been working from NZ and now leaving. They’ll want a full time coach who is committed and working in their environment.

@Wilson re Cheika. I’m still not 100% sure he was really part of the Wobs process. Early reports were that he sought out Waugh to apply. I think RA would be doing the right thing keeping a coach of his caliber in the loop and potentially pitching some scenarios where he took over either the Reds, Tahs or Brumbies pending the head coach decision.

The Reds have a team that can probably win a few SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) titles and I actually think the Cheika sugar rush could be good to get some trophies in the cabinet and keep the buzz.
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)
I can’t see them making the Wallabies job part time. Particularly with this Schmidt situation where he and Cron have been working from NZ and now leaving. They’ll want a full time coach who is committed and working in their environment.

@Wilson re Cheika. I’m still not 100% sure he was really part of the Wobs process. Early reports were that he sought out Waugh to apply. I think RA would be doing the right thing keeping a coach of his caliber in the loop and potentially pitching some scenarios where he took over either the Reds, Tahs or Brumbies pending the head coach decision.

The Reds have a team that can probably win a few SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) (Super Rugby Pacific) titles and I actually think the Cheika sugar rush could be good to get some trophies in the cabinet and keep the buzz.
He made himself part of the process, whether or not he was ever a viable candidate. RA may not feel like they passed him over, but he probably will. Whether or not there's bad blood as a result is not necessarily a give in, but Cheika was not exactly a team player with respect to the broader Australian rugby landscape in his time at the tahs. RA might want to keep him in the frame for more options down the line (though I'm a bit skeptical that they'd be looking at him too close given the reporting on his candidacy as wallabies coach), but that won't go as far with the independent QRU as it might with the Brumbies or tahs, who RA control.

There are scores of coaches going around right now I'd look at to coach the Reds before Cheika, and if he's an option that means the vast majority of the market is too, at least financially. Even if you were to narrow it down to Australians only (I don't see why we would), then getting in Billy Millard paired with an up and coming coach like Halangahu, Peter Hewat or Brock James would be a much better setup.
 

PhilClinton

Paul McLean (56)
McKellar hasn't changed much. He ran off when he was told he wasn't in consideration for the Wallabies gig the first time around and now saying 'he was never in contention' is such a gee up!! He was never good enough.

And Larkham saying he's withdrawn to focus on the Brumbies is such a cop out as well.

Man the fuck up lads, if you weren't good enough to be selected let's just call a spade a spade.
 

Slim 293

George Smith (75)
McKellar hasn't changed much. He ran off when he was told he wasn't in consideration for the Wallabies gig the first time around and now saying 'he was never in contention' is such a gee up!! He was never good enough.

And Larkham saying he's withdrawn to focus on the Brumbies is such a cop out as well.

Man the fuck up lads, if you weren't good enough to be selected let's just call a spade a spade.

What an odd post…
 

Derpus

Phil Waugh (73)
McKellar hasn't changed much. He ran off when he was told he wasn't in consideration for the Wallabies gig the first time around and now saying 'he was never in contention' is such a gee up!! He was never good enough.

And Larkham saying he's withdrawn to focus on the Brumbies is such a cop out as well.

Man the fuck up lads, if you weren't good enough to be selected let's just call a spade a spade.
Hitting BR (still hoping all is well) levels of nonsense parochialism...

I like it.
 

Wilson

John Eales (66)

PhilClinton

Paul McLean (56)
Interesting. That is obviously good for the Reds.

But I have to admit - it seems like RA have let this process get away from them a bit. Maybe they're hyper aware of making sure the right coach is selected after the Eddie Jones stuff, but the whole narrative around this new coach has been drawn out and seems to be bending to the needs of others.

First they throw the kitchen sink at Schmidt and he still decides to leave, then they agree to give him a consulting role and now they're going to have a full time SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) coach also head coaching the Wallabies for the first time in a long time.
 

Tomthumb

Peter Fenwicke (45)
But I don't see a problem here...

They wanted Schmidt to stay... he declined... they put out an EOI... they went through the recruitment process, and have landed on a coach six months before they take over.
The problem is how reactionary RA has been and that they themselves set timelines that they then haven’t met

Schmidt only ever signed through to the Lions, so there should have been a contingency plan already set in place. Instead, it seems their only plan was to beg Schmidt to stay, which failed

They also set the early December timeline for a Schmidt decision and then went radio silent for over a month after. Waugh also said the Wallabies coach would be finalised by the first few rounds of Super rugby, yet here we are over half way though and nothing is confirmed

And now they are seemingly hiring Les Kiss yet not letting him hire all his own assistants and reportedly giving oversight to a guy living in NZ
 

Slim 293

George Smith (75)
The problem is how reactionary RA has been and that they themselves set timelines that they then haven’t met

Schmidt only ever signed through to the Lions, so there should have been a contingency plan already set in place. Instead, it seems their only plan was to beg Schmidt to stay, which failed

They also set the early December timeline for a Schmidt decision and then went radio silent for over a month after. Waugh also said the Wallabies coach would be finalised by the first few rounds of Super rugby, yet here we are over half way though and nothing is confirmed

And now they are seemingly hiring Les Kiss yet not letting him hire all his own assistants and reportedly giving oversight to a guy living in NZ


This all seems a little hysterical to me...

They wanted their preferred candidate to stay, but when he officially declined, despite also being persuaded to stay on longer than initially contracted, they began the recruitment process.

I'm not sure what other contingency they should have put in place?

I think it's safe to assume they're having discussions about all of this in the meantime that the general public aren't privy to...

The whole timeline thing is not a big deal... they put out vague comments about roughly when they might make an announcement, but this is also a process that shouldn't be rushed.

And it's still going to be completed with plenty of time to go.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
and have landed on a coach six months before they take over.

For all the criticism, this appointment will be made with longer between the announcement date and both the start date of the job and the first test under their control than Schmidt's appointment.

That in itself was longer than the lead time on previous appointments.

Rugby Australia have definitely dragged out the process relative to the expectations they set but they also commenced the process earlier than they ever have before leaving them with more time to make the appointment.
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
Les Kiss is pretty underwhelming really... hopefully he goes well though.

Oh, don't be a dick.

McKellar, Cheika, Cron, Larkham... Lancaster. In this group Les is strong. You might not have liked the possibles list, but that might be the problem there.
 

Derpus

Phil Waugh (73)
Oh, don't be a dick.

McKellar, Cheika, Cron, Larkham... Lancaster. In this group Les is strong. You might not have liked the possibles list, but that might be the problem there.
Yeah that's definitely it. None of them are good candidates. The fact Lancaster made the list demonstrates the dearth of options.
 
Top